Article 2019

The relationship of cognitive, affective, and conative elements in problem solving process in engineering learning

Journal of Technical Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 11 · Issue 2 · pp. 23-31
Abstract

Problem solving is one of the main challenges that needs to be mastered in engineering learning. This study aimed at looking whether cognitive, affective and conative elements play role in the process of mastering problem solving skills in engineering learning. Cognitive, affective and conative refer to the ‘Trilogy of Mind’ concept. Educational innovation from 1980-2016 shows that elements proposed in the ‘Trilogy of Mind’ capable in improving academic achievement. Previous studies conducted among engineering students in polytechnics Malaysia show the importance of cognitive, affective and conative elements in mastering problem solving in learning. This study continued in the process of looking whether cognitive, affective and conative can enhance the engineering learning. Strategy (cognitive), attitude (affective) and initiative (conative) are elements that are found to be able to improve academic achievement through the mastery of problem solving. An in-depth study is referring to the process of looking the relationship between strategy and attitude, initiative and attitude as well as the strategy and initiative. This study uses a survey design with a quantitative approach. The sampling method used is a simple random technique. A total of 100 engineering students from polytechnics were involved in this study. The data is analysed based on inferential statistic. The results showed that planned strategy in problems solving can be influenced by students’ attitudes. Besides that, student attitude contributes to student initiative level. Strategy is also associated with initiative in mastering problem solving. © Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Publisher’s Office.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Problem solving Affective Cognitive Conative

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Becker, Frank Stefan, Why don't young people want to become engineers? Rational reasons for disappointing decisions, European Journal of Engineering Education, 35, 4, pp. 349-366, (2010)
2 Handbook II Affective Domain, (1964)
3 Blumenfeld, Phyllis C., Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning, Educational Psychologist, 26, 3-4, pp. 369-398, (1991)
4 Dai, David Yun, Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual development and functioning, Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition: Integrative Perspectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development, pp. 1-455, (2004)
5 Dillashaw, F. Gerald, Effects of a modified mastery learning strategy on achievement, attitudes, and on‐task behavior of high school chemistry students, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 3, pp. 203-211, (1983)
6 Psychology of Learning, (2000)
7 Engineering Education, (1988)
8 Felder, Richard M., The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes, Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 1, pp. 3-17, (2002)
9 Learning how to Teach Mathematical Modeling in School and Teacher Education, (2018)
10 Kesahan Dan Kebolehpercayaan Dalam Kajian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif, (2008)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
8
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85070685789
  • Language English