Article Gold Open Access 2025

Fostering Students' Competencies in Sustainability in Vocational Agriculture Education in Burundi: Effects of a Participatory Integrated Planning (PIP) Module

International Journal of Training and Development
Journal · Vol. 29 · Issue 2 · pp. 108-123
Abstract

Developing students' sustainable agriculture competencies requires the alignment of curriculum content to encompass the full complexity of the dynamics of agriculture. However, empirical evidence from sustainable agriculture research indicates that actions oriented towards fostering students' competencies are scarce. To advance understanding, this study monitored and evaluated the development of students' sustainability competencies for smallholder farming during the implementation of a Participatory Integrated Planning (PIP) module—A sustainability learning programme that elaborates on cross-cutting issues of long-term integrated planning, which is normally not taught. A total number of 104 students from two vocational agricultural schools (N<inf>1</inf> = 63; N<inf>2</inf> = 41) were involved in the PIP learning module that was implemented from April 2022 to June 2023. Survey data on the development of the students' competencies were collected at the beginning (April 2022), in-between (December 2022) and end (June 2023) of the implementation of the PIP module. A one-way repeated measures MANOVA test was used to evaluate the effect of the PIP module on the development of students' competencies. Findings revealed that the PIP module significantly contributed to fostering all intended competencies, including facilitator of change, leadership, innovation and creativity, planning, system thinking, stewardship, auto-determination and interdisciplinarity. Improvement of these competencies was much higher in the earlier stage of the learning process compared to the later stage, implying that sustainability learning requires going beyond ‘business-as-usual’ to retain the interest of students and competencies development. Findings also revealed that competencies development levels differ depending on schools' context, implying that sustainability learning programmes should be flexible and adaptive for learning to occur in a real-context environment. These findings have practical implications for policies related to designing and upscaling sustainability learning programmes in vocational agriculture schools. © 2025 The Author(s). International Journal of Training and Development published by Brian Towers (BRITOW) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Burundi Participatory Integrated Planning (PIP) sustainability learning sustainable agriculture competencies vocational agriculture education

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Burundi, Bujumbura, Burundi
Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
Ministry of Education, MOE
Funding text 1: We acknowledge the active participation of teachers and students from vocational agricultural schools and curriculum advisors from the Ministry of Education. This work was supported by Nuffic: [Grant Number OKP-BDI-10044].; Funding text 2: We acknowledge the active participation of teachers and students from vocational agricultural schools and curriculum advisors from the Ministry of Education. This work was supported by Nuffic: [Grant Number OKP\u2010BDI\u201010044].
Grant: OKP‐BDI‐10044
Funding text 1: We acknowledge the active participation of teachers and students from vocational agricultural schools and curriculum advisors from the Ministry of Education. This work was supported by Nuffic: [Grant Number OKP-BDI-10044].; Funding text 2: We acknowledge the active participation of teachers and students from vocational agricultural schools and curriculum advisors from the Ministry of Education. This work was supported by Nuffic: [Grant Number OKP\u2010BDI\u201010044].
References 10 References
1 Andrade, Heidi Goodrich, A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment, Frontiers in Education, 4, (2019)
2 Bathke, Arne Cornelius, Testing Mean Differences among Groups: Multivariate and Repeated Measures Analysis with Minimal Assumptions, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53, 3, pp. 348-359, (2018)
3 Bergsmann, Evelyn Maria, Evaluation of competence-based teaching in higher education: From theory to practice, Evaluation and Program Planning, 52, pp. 1-9, (2015)
4 Bhat, Zahid Hussain, Evaluating training effectiveness in India: Exploring the relationship between training components, metacognition and learning outcomes, International Journal of Training and Development, 28, 1, pp. 86-117, (2024)
5 Biemans, Harm J.A., Competence-based vet in the netherlands: Background and pitfalls, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56, 4, pp. 523-538, (2004)
6 Biemans, Harm J.A., Towards competence-based VET: Dealing with the pitfalls, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 61, 3, pp. 267-286, (2009)
7 Birdman, Jodie, Developing key competencies in sustainability through project-based learning in graduate sustainability programs, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23, 5, pp. 1139-1157, (2022)
8 Brundiers, Katja, Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework, Sustainability Science, 16, 1, pp. 13-29, (2021)
9 Brundiers, Katja, Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11, 4, pp. 308-324, (2010)
10 Central European Review of Economics and Management, (2019)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers