Article 2019

Governing pluralistic liberal democratic societies and metis knowledge: The problem of Indigenous unemployment

Journal of Sociology
Journal · Vol. 55 · Issue 1 · pp. 37-53
Abstract

High rates of unemployment among Indigenous Australians in comparison to non-Indigenous Australians have been rendered a public policy problem by successive Australian governments. The solutions are often coercive forms of neoliberal governance. However, where Indigenous people are driven by different motivations, ideas and aspirations in relation to work, Indigenous employment policies face the issue of epistemological dissonance. This article aims to contribute to understandings of unsuccessful Indigenous employment policy outcomes by introducing a new conceptualisation of policy and governance limitations and social action. An overview of governmentality literature is coupled with a review of the concept of metis knowledge – a form of know-how that comes from contextualised, practical experience – and its role in limiting the aims of governance. Indigenous employment policy that governs through pedagogical technologies applied to the Indigenous workforce demonstrates this limitation through its assumptions that the metis knowledge required to become ‘work-ready’ can be transferred unproblematically. © The Author(s) 2018.

Keywords

Author Keywords

employment pedagogy Governance Indigenous policy

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University of Tasmania, Hobart, TS, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Canadian Race Relations Foundation, CRRF
Research Council funded project (Grant No. LP130100622). This article is based on analysis undertaken by Alex di Giorgio as part of his doctoral scholarship attached to that project. See http://tellingitlikeitis.com.au. Critiquing these assumptions is a key goal of Scott’s work. Far from being outmoded, rigid and inflexible, as the concept of traditional knowledge implies, he argues the metis knowledge of marginalised populations is fundamentally flexible and highly fluid and adaptable (Scott, 1998: 314).
Australian Research Council, ARC
Research Council funded project (Grant No. LP130100622). This article is based on analysis undertaken by Alex di Giorgio as part of his doctoral scholarship attached to that project. See http://tellingitlikeitis.com.au. Critiquing these assumptions is a key goal of Scott’s work. Far from being outmoded, rigid and inflexible, as the concept of traditional knowledge implies, he argues the metis knowledge of marginalised populations is fundamentally flexible and highly fluid and adaptable (Scott, 1998: 314).
References 10 References
1 Australian Social Trends Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Labour Force Outcomes, (2013)
2 Canberra Anthropology, (1981)
3 Culture Crisis Anthropology and Politics in Aboriginal Australia, (2010)
4 Altman, Jon C., Indigenous policy: Canberra consensus on a neoliberal project of improvement, Australian Public Policy: Progressive Ideas in the Neoliberal Ascendency, pp. 115-132, (2014)
5 Risk Welfare and Work, (2010)
6 Assessing the Evidence on Indigenous Socioeconomic Outcomes A Focus on the 2002 Natsiss, (2006)
7 How Realistic are the Prospects for Closing the Gaps in Socioeconomic Outcomes for Indigenous Australians, (2008)
8 Indigenous Pathways into the Professions, (2011)
9 Cdep Waged Employment Program Benefits Remote Aboriginal Communities, (2015)
10 Proposal for A Remote Development and Employment Scheme Fair Work and Strong Communities, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers