Article Green Open Access 2019

Conceptualizing the designs of authentic computer-supported collaborative learning environments in schools

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Journal · Vol. 14 · Issue 2 · pp. 143-164
Abstract

A major perspective within research on computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) approaches learning as a cultural practice and considers the implications of this on the way classroom learning environments are designed. Often referred to as authentic learning, many innovative approaches to the design of learning environments come with the intention that practices of the people who are experts in a domain are enculturated by the participating students. Different approaches taken given the constraints of educational settings have led to conceptual fragmentation in this area of CSCL scholarship. Therefore, the dual aim of this research is to advance our understanding of the relevant cultures at play when designing for authenticity and show how these cut across different approaches taken for the design of authentic CSCL environments in schools. Using the constant-comparative method, we looked back at the past quarter century of sociocultural research to analyze the way different variations of sociocultural activities, scenes, participants, time, and cultural tools have been designed within authentic CSCL environments. A refined conceptualization of authentic learning that elucidates the relationships between intended, current, and authentic cultures emerged coupled with a novel coding scheme and visualization tool that can help the field rise above the wide variation in designs for authenticity. © 2019, International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Authentic learning design Sociocultural CSCL Enculturation

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Funding & Acknowledgements
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020
Grant: 796045
References 10 References
1 Akkerman, Sanne Floor, Boundary crossing and boundary objects, Review of Educational Research, 81, 2, pp. 132-169, (2011)
2 Akkerman, Sanne Floor, Multilevel Boundary Crossing in a Professional Development School Partnership, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25, 2, pp. 240-284, (2016)
3 Arnseth, Hans Christian, Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 2, pp. 167-185, (2006)
4 Journal of the Learning Sciences, (2001)
5 Barab, Sasha Alexander, Principles of Self-Organization: Learning as Participation in Autocatakinetic Systems, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 3-4, pp. 349-390, (1999)
6 Barab, Sasha Alexander, Constructing networks of action-relevant episodes: An in situ research methodology, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 1-2, pp. 63-112, (2001)
7 Barab, Sasha Alexander, Developing an empirical account of a community of practice: Characterizing the essential tensions, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 4, pp. 489-542, (2002)
8 Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions of Powerful Learning Environments, (2003)
9 Berland, Leema Kuhn, Explaining variation in how classroom communities adapt the practice of scientific argumentation, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20, 4, pp. 625-664, (2011)
10 Bielaczyc, Kate, Multi-player epistemic games: Guiding the enactment of classroom knowledge-building communities, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 1, pp. 33-62, (2014)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
35
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers