Review Gold Open Access 2026

Reconceptualizing Quality Teaching: Insights Based on a Systematic Literature Review

Education Sciences
Journal · Vol. 16 · Issue 1 · Art. 37
Abstract

Quality Teaching is essential for preparing learners for the 21st century. This study proposes a conceptual framework for Quality Teaching embedded in three domains, identifying its focuses and characteristics. We address two questions: What are the focuses of the literature describing Quality Teaching? What are the main characteristics of Quality Teaching in the three domains? A systematic literature review involving 152 articles published between 2000 and 2025, based on the PRISMA guidelines, was conducted to identify key characteristics and theoretical constructs regarding three focuses: teachers, learners, and the education system. The thematic analysis yielded 740 themes related to Quality Teaching. Over half of the themes were related to pedagogy, approximately a quarter to technology, and less than a fifth to social–emotional learning/teaching (SEL/SET). The results suggest that Quality Teaching involves quality pedagogy and high-level socio-emotional proficiency. Professionalization in digital learning technologies also contributes positively to advancing Quality Teaching. Therefore, Quality Teaching requires ongoing training leading to high proficiency in skills, methods, and practices. This study outlines essential components for teacher education and professional development programs. Its novelty lies in systematically highlighting both the distinctive and integrative combined contributions of three professional domains—pedagogy, SEL/SET, and technology—to the enhancement of Quality Teaching in educational systems (focuses), narrowing the gap between theory and practice. © 2025 by the author.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) pedagogy Quality Teaching Social–Emotional Teaching (SET)

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Teacher Education Department, Shaanan Academic Religious Teachers’ College, Haifa, Israel
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Agbo, Friday Joseph, Examining the relationships between students’ perceptions of technology, pedagogy, and cognition: the case of immersive virtual reality mini games to foster computational thinking in higher education, Smart Learning Environments, 10, 1, (2023)
2 Revista De Management Comparat International, (2022)
3 Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, (2018)
4 Higher Education Studies, (2019)
5 Amedu, Jerome, Teachers’ perceptions of using technology to teach mathematics during COVID-19 remote learning, REDIMAT, 11, 1, pp. 71-85, (2022)
6 Anderson, Jason, Building the expert teacher prototype: A metasummary of teacher expertise studies in primary and secondary education, Educational Research Review, 38, (2023)
7 Journal for Educators Teachers and Trainers, (2022)
8 Arega, Natnael Terefe, Constructivist instructional approaches: A systematic review of evaluation-based evidence for effectiveness, Review of Education, 13, 1, (2025)
9 Artino, Anthony R., Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 3, pp. 260-270, (2008)
10 Assadi, Nabil, Training teachers’ perspectives of the effectiveness of the “academy-class” training model on trainees’ professional development, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9, 2, pp. 137-145, (2019)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers