Article Gold Open Access 2026

Augmented Reality in Computer Network Learning: How to Improve Students’ Self-Efficacy?

International Journal of Information and Education Technology
Journal · Vol. 16 · Issue 1 · pp. 91-101
Abstract

This study aims to develop and test a conceptual model comprising six hypotheses focusing on the impact of Augmented Reality (AR) on students’ academic self-efficacy. The research addresses the need to explore how AR technology can improve students’ academic self-efficacy by examining the relationships between AR technology features, task value, usage intention, and personal cognitive approach. A total of 340 students participated in this research, completing online questionnaires as part of a controlled experiment. The Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square was used to assess, test, and analyze the conceptual model. The results of this study indicate that the personal cognitive approach, tech features, and task value implemented by students all positively affect their academic self-efficacy in learning. The personal cognitive approach directly contributes to influencing task values and technological features. Task value and tech features contribute to improving usage intention in students while learning with AR. The personal cognitive approach and the usage intention of use contribute directly and significantly to enhancing students’ academic self-efficacy. Overall, implementing a personal cognitive approach, tech features, task value, and usage intention positively boosted students’ academic self-efficacy in learning with AR. © 2026, International Journal of Information and Education Technology. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Augmented reality self-efficacy computer networks

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Electronics Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Universitas Negeri Makasar, Makasar, Indonesia
Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Department of Physics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
University Oran 1-Algeria, Algiers, Saudi Arabia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Deguchi, Atsushi, What is society 5.0?, Society 5.0: A People-centric Super-smart Society, pp. 1-23, (2020)
2 Mufit, F., Design immersive virtual reality (IVR) with cognitive conflict to support practical learning of quantum physics, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21, 2, pp. 369-388, (2024)
3 Dewi, Ika Parma, How Effective Is Immersive AR Continental Food Course for Vocational Education? Analyzing Knowledge Gains and Learning Outcome Effects, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15, 1, pp. 127-136, (2025)
4 Marta, Rizkayeni, Innovative Learning Strategies: Project-Based Learning Model for Excelling in Visual Programming, TEM Journal, 13, 1, pp. 581-589, (2024)
5 Vásquez-Carbonell, Mauricio, A Systematic Literature Review of Augmented Reality in Engineering Education: Hardware, Software, Student Motivation & Development Recommendations, Digital Education Review, 41, pp. 249-267, (2022)
6 Dewi, Ika Parma, The Impact of Virtual Reality on Programming Algorithm Courses on Student Learning Outcomes, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23, 10, pp. 45-61, (2024)
7 Dhanil, Muhammad, How Virtual Reality Impacts Science Learning? A Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18, 22, pp. 77-96, (2024)
8 Contemporary Educational Technology, (2021)
9 Vaidya, Saurabh, Industry 4.0 - A Glimpse, Procedia Manufacturing, 20, pp. 233-238, (2018)
10 Dargan, Shaveta, Augmented Reality: A Comprehensive Review, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30, 2, pp. 1057-1080, (2023)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers