Informal workplace learning: Development and validation of a measure

Abstract

Informal workplace learning (IWL) is an important part of work-related continuing education, especially in the case of blue-collar workers. The current article presents a new measure of IWL, which we developed based on the already existing Dynamic Model of Informal Learning by Tannenbaum et al. (2010). We extended the model to eight components by theoretical considerations, introducing a second-order structure. Each component is represented on the IWL scale with three items, the subscales have sound internal consistencies (α range between.76 and.92). The article also presents a short version of the scale comprising eight items (α =.79). Study 1 describes the process of item selection, while Study 2 deals with different theoretically conceivable models comparing their model fits. The predicted model with eight factors in a second-order structure achieves the best model fit. In addition, convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity are demonstrated. Medium-sized relationships of IWL components to conscientiousness and learning outcomes confirm the nomological network we developed previously in our study. The discussion provides limitations and possible scientific and practical applications of the IWL scale, for example, the transfer of the measure to other contexts and target groups. © 2019 The Authors. Human Resource Development Quarterly published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords

Author Keywords

informal workplace learning Scale development Blue-collar workers

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations

Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Paderborn University, Paderborn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

Funding & Acknowledgements

No funding information

References 10 References

1 Aguinis, Herman, Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society, Annual Review of Psychology, 60, pp. 451-474, (2009)

2 Anseel, Frederik, Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1, pp. 23-35, (2009)

3 Social Foundations of Thought and Action A Social Cognitive Theory, (1986)

4 Barrick, Murray R., THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS, Personnel Psychology, 44, 1, pp. 1-26, (1991)

5 Barrick, Murray R., Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 1-2, pp. 9-30, (2001)

6 Bell, Bradford S., Active Learning: Effects of Core Training Design Elements on Self-Regulatory Processes, Learning, and Adaptability, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 2, pp. 296-316, (2008)

7 Berg, Shelley A., Factors that influence informal learning in the workplace, Journal of Workplace Learning, 20, 4, pp. 229-244, (2008)

8 van Rijn, Monique Bernadette, Understanding employees' informal workplace learning: The joint influence of career motivation and self-construal, Career Development International, 18, 6, pp. 610-628, (2013)

9 Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, (1988)

10 Billett, Stephen Richard, Workplace learning: Its potential and limitations, Education + Training, 37, 5, pp. 20-27, (1995)

Informal workplace learning: Development and validation of a measure

How to Cite