Associations between workplace learning patterns, social support and perceived competency

Abstract

Despite substantial research in the field of workplace learning and training over the past three decades, these concepts are heavily under-researched in relation to the public sector. By means of survey data, this study explores the use of various learning patterns in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, their association with self-reported competency and the possible interacting role of social support. Descriptive statistics revealed informal guidance to be the most frequently utilised training method, while continuing education at college/university was rated as the least frequently used learning pattern. Paradoxically, multivariate regression analysis indicated that the learning pattern most frequently used had the weakest association with self-reported competency. Despite being one of the least used learning patterns, workplace courses demonstrated the strongest association with self-reported competency. Further multivariate regression analysis was used to explore the interacting role of social support in terms of peer and supervisor support. Results indicated a stronger association between three of the learning patterns and perceived competency for those who experienced higher degrees of supervisor support. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

workplace learning informal learning learning patterns formal learning perceived competency

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations

Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Funding & Acknowledgements

Tokyo Metropolitan University, TMU

I gratefully acknowledge the following individuals for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this article: Silje Bringsrud Fekjær, Lars Inge Terum, Kåre Heggen and Anton Havnes, Oslo Metropolitan University. I also thank the anonymous reviwers at the Human Resource Development International for their helpful comments.

References 10 References

1 Arthur, Winfred J., Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 2, pp. 234-245, (2003)

2 Baldwin, Timothy T., TRANSFER OF TRAINING: A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH, Personnel Psychology, 41, 1, pp. 63-105, (1988)

3 Bandura, Albert, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological Review, 84, 2, pp. 191-215, (1977)

4 Nav as A Learning Organization, (2015)

5 Life Work and Learning Practice in Postmodernity, (2002)

6 Bhatti, Muhammad Awais, Transfer of training: Does it truly happen?: An examination of support, instrumentality, retention and learner readiness on the transfer motivation and transfer of training, European Journal of Training and Development, 37, 3, pp. 273-297, (2013)

7 Blaschke, Lisa Marie, Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 1, pp. 56-71, (2012)

8 Boeren, Ellen, Gender differences in formal, non-formal and informal adult learning, Studies in Continuing Education, 33, 3, pp. 333-346, (2011)

9 Caprara, Gian Vittorio, Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level, Journal of School Psychology, 44, 6, pp. 473-490, (2006)

10 Chiaburu, Dan S., Social support in the workplace and training transfer: A longitudinal analysis, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 2, pp. 187-200, (2010)

Associations between workplace learning patterns, social support and perceived competency

How to Cite