Article Gold Open Access 2025

A modified technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) framework: A systematic literature review

Multidisciplinary Reviews
Journal · Vol. 8 · Issue 6 · Art. e2025167
Abstract

Technology is a critical element of the human perspective on learning. Good teaching with technology requires understanding the mutually reinforcing relationships between content, pedagogy, and technology to develop proper context-specific strategies and representations. TPACK is one of the most researched topics that discusses the interaction and combination of teacher knowledge in the domains of technology, pedagogy, and content. Overtime, TPACK has raised criticism regarding the many areas that had not been explored and the need to reconceptualize the framework. There have been many further developments in the form of modifications to the TPACK model, which have produced various measurement instruments. This research uses a systematic literature review (SLR) method to explore multiple modifications to the TPACK framework and the integration of related fields. The review was carried out on published papers from 2008 to 2023 utilizing the Scopus database. The analysis in the research was carried out through 3 stages: planning, conducting, and reporting. Planning including identify SLR needs, determine the focus of the question, and Develop Review Rules. Furthermore, in conducting, researcher excluding articles that didn’t mention TPACK Development Framework. Last stage is reporting including analyze the main article by creating a review table and answer the Research Question. There were 18 core articles filtered from a total of 1,295 articles. The findings from the thematic analysis identified five areas of study that were integrated with modifications to the TPACK framework, including Knowledge, Competency, Tools, Practice, and Attitude. Finally, exploration was also carried out to see gaps and research potential for future studies in each field. © 2025, Malque Publishing. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Systematic literature review TPACK framework trend

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia
Doctoral Program of Mathematics Education, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia, Department of Mathematics, Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri, Kediri, Indonesia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Psycho Educational Research Reviews, (2021)
2 Angeli Valanides, Charoula Nicos, Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK), Computers and Education, 52, 1, pp. 154-168, (2009)
3 Asamoah, Moses Kumi, TPACKEA Model for Teaching and Students’ Learning, Journal of Academic Ethics, 17, 4, pp. 401-421, (2019)
4 Education Journal, (2022)
5 Aydın-Günbatar, Sevgi, A closer examination of tpack-self-efficacy construct: Modeling elementary pre-service science teachers’ tpack-self efficacy, Elementary Education Online, 16, 3, pp. 917-934, (2017)
6 A Handbook of Elementary Rheology, (2000)
7 Celik, Ismail, Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education, Computers in Human Behavior, 138, (2023)
8 Chai, Ching Sing, Surveying Chinese teachers’ technological pedagogical STEM knowledge: A pilot validation of STEM-TPACK survey, International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 14, 2, pp. 203-214, (2020)
9 Choi, Beomkyu, TPACK-L: teachers’ pedagogical design thinking for the wise integration of technology, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30, 2, pp. 217-234, (2021)
10 Chu, Yuankai, The relationships between teachers' TPACK-R and teaching beliefs of robots, ICCE 2017 - 25th International Conference on Computers in Education: Technology and Innovation: Computer-Based Educational Systems for the 21st Century, Workshop Proceedings, pp. 1-5, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
4
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers