Article 2020

Pattern transformations: Supporting learning of symbolic representations among tvet trainees

Journal of Technical Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 12 · Issue 3 Special Issue · pp. 41-50
Abstract

Symbolic representations are a form of language that is routinely used in technical communications. Trainees in Technical and Vocational Education (TVE) are thus, expected to master symbolic representations concurrently with skills acquisition. Electrical circuit diagram is an example of symbolic representations in use to communicate information on the components and working concepts of an electrical circuit. Mastering symbolic representations in circuit diagram however, can be challenge to some which often lead to miscommunications and poor job performance. Problems are further compounded when trainees need to learn symbols associated with abstract concepts. Inability to master the “symbols language” if remain unchallenged will impact subsequent learning. Appropriately designed instructional materials to address learning of symbolic representations are thus crucial. The aim of this paper is to assess the efficacy of two instructional materials for learning symbolic representations and electrical concepts. A quasi-experimental study with three groups of TVE trainees participated in this study. One group used the existing learning materials (control) while the other two groups used specifically designed pattern transformation materials that are available in two media, print-based and video-based materials. Overall, both experimental groups achieved greater learning on symbolic representations and concepts compared to the control group. Equivalent status was also observed among the experimental groups. This indicates that pattern transformation materials irrespective of media used can be effective at learning symbolic representations in electrical related content. © 2020 UTHM Publisher. All right reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Electrical circuit diagram Learning material Pattern transformation Symbolic learning

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
School of Graduate Studies, Asia e University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Agra, Glenda, Analysis of the concept of Meaningful Learning in light of the Ausubel’s Theory, Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72, 1, pp. 248-255, (2019)
2 Başer, Mustafa, Effect of instruction based on conceptual change activities on students’ understanding of static electricity concepts, Research in Science and Technological Education, 25, 2, pp. 243-267, (2007)
3 Bennett, Amy, The cost of multiple representations: Learning number symbols with abstract and concrete representations, Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 5, pp. 847-860, (2019)
4 Billett, Stephen Richard, Apprenticeship as a mode of learning and model of education, Education and Training, 58, 6, pp. 613-628, (2016)
5 Billett, Stephen Richard, Beyond competence: an essay on a process approach to organising and enacting vocational education, International Journal of Training Research, 14, 3, pp. 197-214, (2016)
6 Brandimonte, Maria Antonella, Influence of Short-Term Memory Codes on Visual Image Processing: Evidence From Image Transformation Tasks, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1, pp. 157-165, (1992)
7 Brna, Paul, Confronting misconceptions in the domain of simple electrical circuits, Instructional Science, 17, 1, pp. 29-55, (1988)
8 Burvill, Colin, Problem-solving with industrial drawings: Supporting formal graphics language development for Malaysian engineering graduates, International Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 5, pp. 2172-2183, (2016)
9 Chen, Yulung, Efficacy of simulation-based learning of electronics using visualization and manipulation, Educational Technology and Society, 14, 2, pp. 269-277, (2011)
10 Chi, Michelene T.H., Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 2, pp. 161-199, (2005)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers