Article 2020

The revised Inventory Learning to Teach Process: Development of a questionnaire measuring how student teachers learn

Pedagogische Studien
Journal · Vol. 97 · Issue 6 · pp. 378-402
Abstract

One of the key tasks of teacher education (for primary and secondary education) is to support student teachers to develop competencies that enable teachers to continue professional learning, also after graduation. Two decades ago, the Inventory Learning to Teach Process (ILTP) was developed to get insight in student teachers' process of learning to teach. This self-report questionnaire measures with ten scales student teachers' learning and regulation activities, emotion regulation and conceptions of learning to teach. In this paper, we examine the construct validity of the Inventory Learning to Teach Process using state of the art techniques and develop a parsimonious version of the instrument. The dataset included 1,094 student teachers. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the factorial structure of the instrument. A shorter 29-item version of the instrument was developed and resulted in good fit and scale reliabilities. The learning conception scales could not be retained in any form. This more parsimonious revised version of the ILTP (ILTP-R) can be used in future research to study the development of student teachers' way of learning over time. In addition, the ILTP-R gives practitioners the possibility to substantiate their feedback concerning how their student teachers approach their learning with validated and reliable measurements. © 2020 Vereniging voor Onderwijsresearch (VOR). All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Teacher Education Validation Questionnaire student teachers learning to teach

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Technologie bij het departement Learning, Data-analytics and Technology, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands
Departement Opleidings- en Onderwijswetenschappen, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, VAN, Belgium
Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Bakkenes, Inge, Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers, Learning and Instruction, 20, 6, pp. 533-548, (2010)
2 Beijaard, Douwe, Understanding how teachers learn as a prerequisite for promoting teacher learning, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13, 2, pp. 105-108, (2007)
3 Biggs, John B., Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment, Higher Education, 32, 3, pp. 347-364, (1996)
4 Boulton-Lewis, Gillian M., Teachers as adult learners: Their knowledge of their own learning and implications for teaching, Higher Education, 32, 1, pp. 89-106, (1996)
5 Bronkhorst, Larike Henriette, Fostering meaning-oriented learning and deliberate practice in teacher education, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 7, pp. 1120-1130, (2011)
6 Clarke, David J., Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth, Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 8, pp. 947-967, (2002)
7 Role of the University in the Preparation of Teachers, (1999)
8 Dawes, John G., Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales, International Journal of Market Research, 50, 1, pp. 61-77, (2008)
9 Deci, Edward L., The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 4, pp. 227-268, (2000)
10 Dinno, Alexis, Exploring the sensitivity of Horn's parallel Analysis to the distributional form of random data, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 3, pp. 362-388, (2009)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85129316037
  • Language English