Book 2020

Grading Goal Four: Tensions, Threats, and Opportunities in the Sustainable Development Goal on Quality Education

Grading Goal Four: Tensions, Threats, and Opportunities in the Sustainable Development Goal on Quality Education
Journal · pp. 1-469
Abstract

For the third time in three decades world leaders reaffirmed their promise of "Education For All" when adopting Sustainable Development Goal 4 in 2015. It is the most far-reaching commitment to quality and equity in education so far, yet, there is no consensus on what the agenda means in practice. With a decade left until the 2030 deadline, Grading Goal Four calls upon the education community to engage more thoughtfully and critically with SDG 4 and related efforts. As an ever-growing number of actors and initiatives claim to contribute to its achievement, it is becoming clear that the ambitious but broad priorities within the goal are vulnerable to cherry-picking and misrepresentation, placing it at the heart of tensions between instrumentalist and rights-based approaches to education. This text, a critical analysis of SDG 4, provides a framework for examining trends and developments in education globally. As the first volume that examines early implementation efforts under SDG 4, Grading Goal Four formulates a critique along with strategies for moving forward. By scrutinising the challenges, tensions and power dynamics shaping SDG 4, it advances rights-based perspectives and strategies for effective implementation and builds capacity for strengthened monitoring and analysis of the goal. © 2020 by Koninklijke Brill NV.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Not provided
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Abraham, John, Positivism, Structurationism and the Differentiation-Polarisation Theory: A reconsideration of Shilling’s novelty and primacy thesis, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15, 2, pp. 231-241, (1994)
2 Acedo, Clementina, Quality and qualities: Tensions in education reforms, Quality and Qualities: Tensions in Education Reforms, pp. 1-221, (2012)
3 Ackerman, Xanthe Scharff, Gains and gaps in girls’ education, Compare, 47, 1, pp. 133-136, (2017)
4 Act Alliance Advocacy Strategy, (2016)
5 Learning by Doing Civil Society Engagement in the High Level Political Forums National Review Process, (2016)
6 Monitoring and Accountability Working Group Planning Meeting Notes, (2017)
7 Mistreated the Tax Treaties that are Depriving the World S Poorest Countries of Vital Revenue, (2016)
8 Comparative Perspectives on Language and Literacy, (1999)
9 Addey, Camilla, Golden relics & historical standards: how the OECD is expanding global education governance through PISA for Development, Critical Studies in Education, 58, 3, pp. 311-325, (2017)
10 Global Education Policy and International Development New Agendas Issues and Policies, (2018)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
33
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers