Article 2020

The scientific nature of work-based learning and research: An introduction to first principles

Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning
Journal · Vol. 10 · Issue 1 · pp. 171-186
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the scientific nature of work-based learning (WBL) and research as operationalized in Professional Studies by examining first principles of scientific inquiry. Design/methodology/approach: This paper introduces a Professional Studies program as it has been implemented at University of Southern Queensland in Australia and examines it from the perspective of five first principles of scientific inquiry: systematic exploration and reporting, use of models, objectivity, testability and applicability. The authors do so not to privilege the meritorious qualities of science or to legitimise WBL or its example in Professional Studies by conferring on them the status of science, but to highlight their systematised approach to learning and research. Findings: If the authors define Professional Studies to mean the systematic inquiry of work-based people, processes and phenomena, evidence affirmatively suggests that it is scientific “in nature”. Originality/value: WBL has been well documented, but its orientation to research, particularly mixed methods (MM) research through Professional Studies, and its adherence to first principles of science have never been explored; this paper begins to uncover the value of work-based pedagogical approaches to learning and research. © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

work-based learning (WBL) Mixed methods Scientific Inquiry Work-based research Professional studies

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Applicability of Mathematics in Science Indispensability and Ontology, (2012)
2 Basalla, George, The spread of Western science, Science, 156, 3775, pp. 611-622, (1967)
3 Bokulich, Alisa, How scientific models can explain, Synthese, 180, 1, pp. 33-45, (2011)
4 Bright, Liam Kofi, On fraud, Philosophical Studies, 174, 2, pp. 291-310, (2017)
5 Academic Leadership Series, (2016)
6 Calderhead, James, Understanding Teacher Education: Case Studies in the Professional Development of Beginning Teachers, Understanding Teacher Education: Case Studies in the Professional Development of Beginning Teachers, pp. 1-235, (2003)
7 Candlin, Fiona, Practice-based doctorates and questions of academic legitimacy, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 19, 1, pp. 96-101, (2000)
8 Cartwright, Nancy Delaney, Scientific models versus social reality, Building Research and Information, 44, 3, pp. 334-337, (2016)
9 What is this Thing Called Science, (1982)
10 Clark, Jill, Transformation in interdisciplinary research methodology: the importance of shared experiences in landscapes of practice, International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 40, 3, pp. 243-256, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
6
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers