Article 2020

Science recreation workshops groups in Mexico: a study on an emergent community

International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement
Journal · Vol. 10 · Issue 2 · pp. 133-148
Abstract

The main goal for Science Recreation Workshops (SRWs) is to build communities that create meaningful experiences, while participants engage with science in a practical manner. This triggers processes where acting and knowing go hand-in-hand to involve each person as a whole. This requires physical, intellectual and emotional interaction to recreate various science aspects, such as knowledge, history, challenges and controversies. Just as SRWs are collective efforts, as public activities, they are usually promoted by groups as well. But, to the contrary of what happens in SRW with the public, it is common that the group efforts are more geared towards practice than theory. They prioritize working with the public rather than discussing the theoretical and methodological foundations for SRW, or their main challenges as they seek to train new members, evaluate their performance or create new activities. Groups interact with each other, however, this has only led to collaboration on projects rather than to a significant formal discussion. This article focuses specifically on SRW groups in Mexico, as a case study of an emerging community of practice. Data from active organizations were collected in 2009 and 2019, allowing us to compare the situation in these two periods of time and provides perspective on the community’s evolution. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

experience-based science activities public communication of science and technology Science recreation workshops science communities of practice

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Science Museum, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, ZAC, Mexico
Department of Science & Technology Studies, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Anastopoulou, Stamatina, Creating Personal Meaning through Technology-Supported Science Inquiry Learning across Formal and Informal Settings, International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2, pp. 251-273, (2012)
2 Bell, Philip A., Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits, Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits, pp. 1-349, (2009)
3 Identifying and Supporting Productive STEM Programs in Out-of-School Settings, Identifying and Supporting Productive STEM Programs in Out-of-School Settings, pp. 1-70, (2015)
4 Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice, (2005)
5 Dewey, John, The American Association for the Advancement of Science: Science as subject-matter and as method, Science, 31, 787, pp. 121-127, (1910)
6 Experience and Nature, (1925)
7 Learning from Museums Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning, (2000)
8 Fenichel, Marilyn, Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments, Surrounded by Science: Learning Science in Informal Environments, pp. 1-220, (2010)
9 Six Easy Pieces, (1995)
10 Journal of College Science Teaching, (2005)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
4
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers