Article Gold Open Access 2020

A case study on comparison of high school students’ scientific literacy competencies domain in physics with different methods: PBL-stem education, PBL, and conventional learning

Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Journal · Vol. 9 · Issue 2 · pp. 159-168
Abstract

Literacy skill is needed in the 21st century learning, whereas research about the implementation of Problem Based Learning-Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (PBL-STEM) to develop students’ ability of scientific literacy is still limited. This research purposed to compare students’ scientific literacy competencies domain improvement through PBL-STEM in the topic of optical instrument. The quasi-experiment non-equivalent group design involved the students of Senior High School 9 Malang Indonesia in three classes called PBL-STEM, PBL, and control class. PBL-STEM class made three products, which were camera obscura, magnifier, and binoculars, which were presented with posters and reports. The PBL class, on the other hand, only made binoculars and presented their work briefly. Scientific Literacy Ability Test was used with 0.88 Cronbach’s alpha reliability. Data analysis with one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey test, N-gain, and Cohen’s effect size was conducted. The result showed that three classes had a significantly different ability in scientific literacy. Scientific literacy competencies domain of PBL-STEM was the highest, while PBL class is higher than the control class. The improvement of both PBL-STEM and PBL belonged in medium category, whereas the improvement in the control class was in low category. The effect of the operational implementation of PBL-STEM and PBL pair yielded large result, and both PBL-STEM and control and PBL and control pairs yielded very large category in the improvement of students’ scientific literacy. © 2020 Science Education Study Program FMIPA UNNES Semarang.

Keywords

Author Keywords

STEM PBL scientific literacy Optical instrument

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Physics Education, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Department of Educational Sciences, Mathematics and Creative Multimedia, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ardianto, Didit, Comparison of students’ scientific literacy in integrated science learning through model of guided discovery and problem based learning, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5, 1, pp. 31-37, (2016)
2 Learning to Teach, (2012)
3 Implementation of Levels of Inquiry on Science Learning to Improve Junior High School Students Scientific Literacy Penerapan Levels of Inquiry Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa Smp, (2015)
4 Journal of Stem Education, (2011)
5 Proceedings of the 2nd International Stem in Education Conference, (2012)
6 Technology and Engineering Teacher, (2010)
7 Educational Research Planning Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, (2002)
8 Docktor, Jennifer L., Conceptual problem solving in high school physics, Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11, 2, (2015)
9 In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia Dan Pembelajarannya, (2016)
10 Griese, Birgit, Refining questionnaire-based assessment of STEM students’ learning strategies, International Journal of STEM Education, 2, 1, (2015)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
34
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers