Article Green Open Access 2020

Pandemic designs for the future: perspectives of technology education teachers during COVID-19

Information and Learning Science
Journal · Vol. 121 · Issue 5-6 · pp. 409-421
Abstract

Purpose: The disruption caused by the pandemic declaration and subsequent public health measures put in place have had a substantial effect on teachers’ abilities to support student engagement in technology education (TE). The purpose of this paper is to explore the following research question: How do TE teachers see emergency remote teaching (ERT) transitions to blended learning into the next academic year affecting their profession? Design/methodology/approach: A snowball and convenience sampling design was used to recruit specialist teachers in TE through their professional organization and were asked to respond to the question: What are your concerns about the future of teaching TE remotely? The qualitative data collected from the participants (N = 42) was analyzed thematically (Braun and Clarke, 2006). Findings: The analysis revealed that the switch to ERT impacted the teachers’ ability to support hands-on competency development owing to inequitable student access to tools, materials and resources, all of which affected student motivation and engagement. As a result, teachers raised questions about the overall effectiveness of online learning approaches and TE’s future and sustainability if offered completely online. Originality/value: This research is the first of its kind exploring the experiences of TE teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. In answer to the challenges identified by teachers, the authors offer a blended learning design framework informed by pandemic transformed pedagogy that can serve as a model for educators to use when designing blended instruction. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

engineering blended learning STEM online learning COVID-19 Technology Education Trades secondary school Hybrid learning Teacher perspective remote teaching Pandemic transformed pedagogy

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Funding & Acknowledgements
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, SSHRC
Grant: 430–2016-00480
Funding text 1: Funding: Jillianne Code is supported in part by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430–2016-00480).; Funding text 2: The authors would like to thank the British Columbia Technology Education Association and the technology education teachers for participating in this research. We would also like to acknowledge the UBC Technology Education teacher candidate class of 2020 and Dr Samson Nashon and Kerry Renwick for their insightful feedback on drafts of this manuscript. Funding : Jillianne Code is supported in part by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430–2016-00480).
University of British Columbia, UBC
Funding text 1: Funding: Jillianne Code is supported in part by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430–2016-00480).; Funding text 2: The authors would like to thank the British Columbia Technology Education Association and the technology education teachers for participating in this research. We would also like to acknowledge the UBC Technology Education teacher candidate class of 2020 and Dr Samson Nashon and Kerry Renwick for their insightful feedback on drafts of this manuscript. Funding : Jillianne Code is supported in part by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430–2016-00480).
References 10 References
1 Boelens, Ruth, Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review, Educational Research Review, 22, pp. 1-18, (2017)
2 Braun, Virginia, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, pp. 77-101, (2006)
3 Applied Design Skills and Technology K 12 Curriculum Thinking, (2018)
4 Applied Design Skills and Technology K 12 Curriculum Machining and Welding 12, (2018)
5 Continuity of Learning Planning Guide for Teachers, (2020)
6 Frequently Asked Questions Faqs on Continuity of Learning, (2020)
7 Integrated Planning Framework for School Districts and Independent School Authorities, (2020)
8 Clearing House, (2010)
9 de Bruijn, Elly D., Authentic and self-directed learning in vocational education: Challenges to vocational educators, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 4, pp. 694-702, (2011)
10 Dougherty, Dale, The maker mindset, Design, Make, Play: Growing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators, pp. 7-11, (2013)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
110
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers