Article 2020

Inquiry-based learning: Development of an introductory manufacturing processes course based on a mobile inverted pendulum robot

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education
Journal · Vol. 48 · Issue 4 · pp. 371-390
Abstract

This paper describes the development of an innovative introductory manufacturing processes course designed to expose students to a broad overview of fundamental concepts, methods, procedures, tools, and equipment used in the manufacturing industry. Based on an educational mobile inverted pendulum robot, students are introduced to product design and prototyping by identifying an existing problem with a component in the robot, redesigning the component using computer aided design software, and then building a prototype using additive manufacturing methods. Subsequently, a set of hypothetical design requirement changes is imposed, and various design methods and manufacturing processes that can be used to make components to satisfy these new requirements are discussed. Topics covered include integrated product design, additive manufacturing prototyping based on different technologies, plastic injection molding, sand casting, and fundamentals of both computer aided manufacturing and computer numerical control machining. Tools, fixtures, and accessories required in these processes, as well as associated challenges, are also discussed. This course adapts the inquiry-based learning active learning pedagogical approach and focuses on the development of students’ ability to conduct analytical analysis and to apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to solve practical engineering technology problems. As an introductory course designed to be offered to freshman level students, this course engages students in engineering technology related topics and stimulates their interest in manufacturing related subjects. It helps with improving the engineering student retention rate and serves as a pathway connecting students to more advanced specialized manufacturing courses such as computer numerical control machining technology. This paper presents course materials developed and student feedback as well as their evaluation of the course effectiveness based on a summative questionnaire-style survey from the first cohort of students. © The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Active learning inquiry-based learning additive manufacturing computer numerical control computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing manufacturing processes

Index Keywords

Curricula Engineering education Product design Students artificial intelligence Computer aided instruction Computer control systems Computer aided design computer numerical control Active learning Additives Inquiry-based learning Machine design Manufacturing process Surveys Petroleum reservoir evaluation Numerical control systems Robots 3D printers Computer aided manufacturing Computer integrated manufacturing Computer control Injection molding Pendulums Computer numerical control machining Computer-aided design software Mobile inverted pendulum Plastic injection molding
Author Affiliations
Department of Engineering Technology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 undefined, (1991)
2 Active Learning 101 Strategies to Teach Any Subject, (1996)
3 Anaya, Guadalupe, College Experiences and Student Learning: The Influence of Active Learning, College Environments and Cocurricular Activities, Journal of College Student Development, 37, 6, pp. 611-622, (1996)
4 Inquiry Based Instruction Concept Essence Importance and Contribution, (2015)
5 undefined, (2010)
6 Universal Journal of Educational Research, (2014)
7 Kollöffel, Bas, Conceptual understanding of electrical circuits in secondary vocational engineering education: Combining traditional instruction with inquiry learning in a virtual lab, Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 3, pp. 375-393, (2013)
8 Damşa, Crina I., Student Learning Through Participation in Inquiry Activities: Two Case Studies in Teacher and Computer Engineering Education, Vocations and Learning, 9, 3, pp. 275-294, (2016)
9 Kirschner, Paul A., Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching, Educational Psychologist, 41, 2, pp. 75-86, (2006)
10 Michael, Joel A., Where's the evidence that active learning works?, American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 4, pp. 159-167, (2006)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
7
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers