Article 2021

Conceiving the relationship between theory and practice in T-VET. An in-depth study on key actors’ epistemological perspectives

Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 73 · Issue 3 · pp. 392-412
Abstract

The integration of theory and practice constitutes an anchor of today’s technical vocational education and training (T-VET) and a major determinant of professional development. Understanding such integration is expected to contribute to pedagogical advancement and to provide new research tools. Current knowledge on the epistemological roots of pedagogical approaches is not automatically informative of the conceptions and beliefs of the students and their instructors in particular learning contexts. Therefore, if we are to disentangle further the theory-practice integration in T-VET, a first step is to grasp how these key actors conceive of theoretical and practical knowledge and the relationship between these kinds of knowledge. Thirty-eight subjects in dual T-VET in the field of chemical process technology, participated in serial and single focus groups. While adopting a grounded theory approach, the present qualitative study reveals the negotiated epistemological perspectives of students, school-instructors and workplace-instructors: forms of knowledge that respond to conceptions of theory or practice, the relationships between these forms of knowledge and the multiple agents who perform each connecting activity. The findings reveal a possible expression of the overall ‘integration of theory and practice’ as involving a network of relationships that are embodied by multiple agents. The implications are discussed. © 2020 The Vocational Aspect of Education Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

workplace learning Vocational education & training learning in the professions vocational & educational guidance philosophy of VET learning in Life & Work Transitions

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Training and Education Sciences, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, VAN, Belgium
Department of Sociology, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, VAN, Belgium
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Akkerman, Sanne Floor, Boundary crossing and boundary objects, Review of Educational Research, 81, 2, pp. 132-169, (2011)
2 Barber, James P., Integration of Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of College Students' Learning, American Educational Research Journal, 49, 3, pp. 590-617, (2012)
3 Barger, Michael M., Developmental changes in college engineering students' personal epistemology profiles, Learning and Individual Differences, 48, pp. 1-8, (2016)
4 Bathmaker, Ann Marie, Defining 'knowledge' in vocational education qualifications in England: an analysis of key stakeholders and their constructions of knowledge, purposes and content, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 65, 1, pp. 87-107, (2013)
5 Westminster Studies in Education, (2000)
6 Bernstein, Basil, Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20, 2, pp. 157-173, (1999)
7 Billett, Stephen Richard, Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation, and engagement, Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 1, pp. 27-43, (2002)
8 Billett, Stephen Richard, Personal epistemologies, work and learning, Educational Research Review, 4, 3, pp. 210-219, (2009)
9 Making It Explicit, (1994)
10 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, (1995)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
7
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers