Article Green Open Access 2021

Degree apprenticeships - a win-win model? A comparison of policy aims with the expectations and experiences of apprentices

Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 73 · Issue 4 · pp. 505-525
Abstract

This article compares policy aims with experiences following the introduction of a new model for STEM apprenticeships in the UK. Degree apprentices work while studying for a degree, undertaking work-based learning and attending on-campus classes. Specifically, this study explores an implementation in Scotland, where computing degrees are designed and delivered through partnerships between employers, universities, and the Scottish Government’s skills agency, Skills Development Scotland. This collaboration is designed to bridge employer-reported skills gaps and to bring about an increase in highly-skilled workers. To examine the policy implementation behind the new degrees, a review was conducted of the policy documents that framed their introduction, including texts from university and employer websites promoting apprenticeships. The apprentices’ perspectives, barely addressed in the policy documents, were examined through surveys and narrative interviews. The policy documents positioned the new degrees as a ‘win-win’ opportunity for employer-led higher education, and the apprentices recognised and valued the opportunity to undertake a work-based degree. However, underneath the superficial win-win narrative a complex implementation landscape was observed for employers, apprentices, and universities. Understanding these stakeholder contexts is essential for the longer term sustainability of degree apprenticeships. © 2020 The Vocational Aspect of Education Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

degree apprenticeship work-based learning work-integrated learning computing graduate apprenticeship

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Centre for Computing Education Research, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
European Social Fund, ESF
Grant: 15/28, 47/50
Funding text 1: Graduate apprenticeships are funded by Skills Development Scotland and the European Social Fund.; Funding text 2: Graduate apprenticeships are funded by Skills Development Scotland and the European Social Fund. The survey was completed by 22/28 of the first cohort of computing apprentices and 47/50 of the second; 15/28 of the first cohort were interviewed. Any demographics apply to the research groups, rather than the full cohorts.
References 10 References
1 Ball, Stephen J., Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociology, Politics and Policy Making in Education: Explorations in Sociology, 33, pp. 1-238, (2012)
2 Balloo, Kieran, Undergraduates’ personal circumstances, expectations and reasons for attending university, Studies in Higher Education, 42, 8, pp. 1373-1384, (2017)
3 Bathmaker, Ann Marie, Defining 'knowledge' in vocational education qualifications in England: an analysis of key stakeholders and their constructions of knowledge, purposes and content, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 65, 1, pp. 87-107, (2013)
4 Department for Business Innovation and Skills, (2016)
5 Work Based Learning A New Higher Education, (2001)
6 Bowen, Glenn A., Document analysis as a qualitative research method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 2, pp. 27-40, (2009)
7 Braun, Virginia, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, pp. 77-101, (2006)
8 Bravenboer, Darryll Willem, Why co-design and delivery is "a no brainer" for higher and degree apprenticeship policy, Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 6, 4, pp. 384-400, (2016)
9 Report for the Gatsby Foundation, (2017)
10 Donnelly, Rory, Does the UK have a 'comparative institutional advantage' that is supportive of the IT services sector?, New Technology, Work and Employment, 26, 2, pp. 98-112, (2011)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
28
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers