Article Gold Open Access 2021

The retention effect of training: Portability, visibility, and credibility1

International Journal of Human Resource Management
Journal · Vol. 33 · Issue 4 · pp. 710-741
Abstract

This paper analyses the effect of training participation on employees’ retention in the training establishment. On the basis of the human capital and monopsony theories the effect of portability, visibility, and credibility of training on employee retention is jointly calculated. We use an extensive German linked employer–employee panel data set with detailed survey information on the training history and administrative labour market information of 4318 employees working in 149 establishments (WeLL-ADIAB). In multivariate panel regressions including internal instruments we compare the probability of staying with the same employer between training participants and employees who were by chance unable to participate in a planned training event. The high portability of training contents and training visibility provided by training certificates reduce the retention effect of training independently. Retention is reduced further when training content is reported credibly, that is, it is provided and certified by external institutions. However, the total effect of portable, visible, and credible training on retention is still positive. This paper therefore implies that employers can reap a double dividend of higher productivity and increased retention even from general, visible, and credible training. © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Training M53 retention J62 J63 linked employer-employee data M51

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Business and Economics, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Wurzburg, Bayern, Germany
Department of Business and Economics, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Wurzburg, Bayern, Germany, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH, Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Acemoglu, Daron, Why do firms train? theory and evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1, pp. 78-119, (1998)
2 Acemoglu, Daron, Beyond becker: Training in imperfect labour markets, Economic Journal, 109, 453, pp. 112-142, (1999)
3 Acemoglu, Daron, Certification of training and training outcomes, European Economic Review, 44, 4-6, pp. 917-927, (2000)
4 Aguinis, Herman, Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society, Annual Review of Psychology, 60, pp. 451-474, (2009)
5 Angrist, Joshua D., Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion, Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion, pp. 1-373, (2008)
6 Arellano, Manuel, Some tests of specification for panel data:monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 2, pp. 277-297, (1991)
7 Autor, David H., Why do temporary help firms provide free general skills training?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 4, pp. 1409-1448, (2001)
8 Barron, John M., How well do we measure training?, Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 3, pp. 507-528, (1997)
9 On the Job Training, (1997)
10 Concealing General Training Why Restricting Alternatives Makes Sense, (1997)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
18
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers