Article 2025

Educator Perspectives on the Transformative Power of Authentic Assessments on Student Engagement, Empowerment, and Inclusivity

Educational Practice and Theory
Journal · Vol. 47 · Issue 1 · pp. 41-54
Abstract

This study explores the transformative impact of authentic assessments on student engagement, empowerment, and inclusivity in higher education. Traditional assessment methods often fail to adequately assess diverse skill sets and prepare students for real-world professional demands. In contrast, authentic assessments allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and skills in meaningful, context-rich tasks that mirror professional challenges. Through the perspectives of six experienced academics, this mixed-methods study explores how authentic and flexible assessments promote student agency, inclusivity, and engagement. The findings highlight the importance of aligning assessments with clear learning objectives, offering students choices, and embedding real-world relevance to foster deeper learning and equitable opportunities. However, the study also reveals tensions between the inclusivity offered in academic settings and the less flexible demands of the professional world, suggesting a need for ongoing reflection in assessment design. Ultimately, the study calls for reimagined assessment practices that empower students and better prepare them for future success. © 2025 James Nicholas Publishers.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Higher education Student engagement Authentic assessment inclusivity academic knowledge

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ajjawi, Rola, Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: the challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45, 2, pp. 304-316, (2020)
2 Armellini, Alejandro, Student Perspectives on Learning Experiences in a Higher Education Active Blended Learning Context, TechTrends, 65, 4, pp. 433-443, (2021)
3 Ashford-Rowe, Kevin, Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 2, pp. 205-222, (2014)
4 Fifty Tips for Replacements for Time Constrained, (2020)
5 Charlton, Nicholas, Program-level assessment planning in Australia: the considerations and practices of university academics, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 48, 6, pp. 820-833, (2023)
6 Dann, Ruth, Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21, 2, pp. 149-166, (2014)
7 Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, (2014)
8 Gulikers, Judith Theresia Maria, A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment, Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 3, pp. 67-86, (2004)
9 Gulikers, Judith Theresia Maria, Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: Student and teacher perceptions of assessment authenticity, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 60, 4, pp. 401-412, (2008)
10 Harland, Tony, An assessment arms race and its fallout: high-stakes grading and the case for slow scholarship, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 4, pp. 528-541, (2015)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers