Article 2021

Relationship between achievement goals and attention of university instructors in higher education professional training courses

Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning
Journal · Vol. 11 · Issue 4 · pp. 860-873
Abstract

Purpose: Professional training courses play an important role for higher education instructors and their teaching quality. However, participants strongly differ in how much they learn in these courses. The present study seeks to explain these differences by focusing on attention as a central aspect of their behavioral engagement that can stem from participants' achievement motivations. Design/methodology/approach: The authors investigated the attention of participants in full-day higher education professional training courses and how differences therein are associated with their achievement goals. Prior to course participation, 117 university instructors (49.6% male, 79.5% with PhD, average age 31.4 years) reported their achievement goals. Using an adapted observational instrument (Hommel, 2012a), two raters subsequently observed and coded the participants' attention during the course (ICC2 = 0.83). Findings: The results documented very high attention levels, although with substantial interindividual differences. Multilevel analyses indicated that learning goals positively and work avoidance goals negatively predicted observed attention. Originality/value: The findings provide insight into the value of an observational approach to measuring a fundamental aspect of learning engagement, and contribute to the understanding of interindividual differences in an important higher education learning environment. The study illuminates the relevance of personal predictors for university instructors' successful learning. Specifically, the findings point to the significance of goals as a relevant, but surprisingly hitherto uninvestigated, premise of learning engagement. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

attention professional training Observation achievement goals University instructors

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Bayern, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG
Grant: DR 454/8-1
The authors thank Christian Eibl and Susanne Ree\u00DF for their help in conducting the study, and Raven Rinas for her help in proofreading the paper.Author contributions : Markus Dresel and Martin Daumiller conceived of the presented idea. Benjamin K\u00FCcherer, Markus Dresel, and Martin Daumiller planned the study. Benjamin K\u00FCcherer was in charge of data collection and had full access to all the data in the study and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Benjamin K\u00FCcherer and Martin Daumiller drafted the article. Markus Dresel and Martin Daumiller provided critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. Markus Dresel and Martin Daumiller provided administrative, technical, and material support. All authors approved of the version to be published.The research reported in this article was supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemein-schaft; DFG): Grant DR 454/8-1 awarded to Markus Dresel.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG
The authors thank Christian Eibl and Susanne Ree\u00DF for their help in conducting the study, and Raven Rinas for her help in proofreading the paper.Author contributions : Markus Dresel and Martin Daumiller conceived of the presented idea. Benjamin K\u00FCcherer, Markus Dresel, and Martin Daumiller planned the study. Benjamin K\u00FCcherer was in charge of data collection and had full access to all the data in the study and takes full responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Benjamin K\u00FCcherer and Martin Daumiller drafted the article. Markus Dresel and Martin Daumiller provided critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. Markus Dresel and Martin Daumiller provided administrative, technical, and material support. All authors approved of the version to be published.The research reported in this article was supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemein-schaft; DFG): Grant DR 454/8-1 awarded to Markus Dresel.
References 10 References
1 Aarts, Henk J.M., On the psychology of drinking: Being thirsty and perceptually ready, British Journal of Psychology, 92, 4, pp. 631-642, (2001)
2 Amundsen, Cheryl Lynn, Are we asking the right questions?: A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education, Review of Educational Research, 82, 1, pp. 90-126, (2012)
3 Anderson, Lorin W., Attention, tasks and time, Time and School Learning: Theory, Research and Practice, pp. 46-68, (2018)
4 Baer, Ruth A., Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills, Assessment, 11, 3, pp. 191-206, (2004)
5 Butler, Ruth, Striving to connect: Extending an achievement goal approach to teacher motivation to include relational goals for teaching, Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 3, pp. 726-742, (2012)
6 Crouzevialle, Marie, Performance-approach goals deplete working memory and impair cognitive performance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 3, pp. 666-678, (2013)
7 Flow Das Geheimnis Des Glucks Flow the Secret of Luck, (2018)
8 Daniels, Jeannie, Professional learning in higher education: making good practice relevant, International Journal for Academic Development, 22, 2, pp. 170-181, (2017)
9 Darnon, Céline, Achievement goals in social interactions: Learning with Mastery vs. Performance goals, Motivation and Emotion, 31, 1, pp. 61-70, (2007)
10 Motivation of University Scholars for Teaching and Research, (2018)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
5
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers