Article 2021

Evaluating team performance in a student led multidisciplinary project course with the painter method

International Journal of Engineering Education
Journal · Vol. 37 · Issue 2 · pp. 433-445
Abstract

The authors have developed a methodology for teachers to help them to evaluate the performance of a team of students in engineering project-based courses. The methodology was given the name PAINTER and in this paper we demonstrate it with a case study. We use PAINTER to evaluate an engineering project-based course-Formula Student/Formula SAE. The course has been run for 10 years and has the same objective every year-to improve the last year's design. The performance of the team-measured by the score received at competitions-has been around the same level all the years. Efforts taken by teachers to improve the performance of the team have ended in vain. The results show that by using the methodology teachers get a good understanding of potential issues preventing the team from advancing. PAINTER is a relatively easy to use, yet powerful, tool that can be systematically used to identify performance issues. Using PAINTER each factor must be evaluated and scored using reasoning-this systematic approach results in good understanding of the team's dynamics. PAINTER makes issues more prominent and helps the user to decide which issues need to be explored. Although PAINTER was designed for evaluating team of students it is a tool that should be useful for evaluating the performance of other types of teams, e.g., in industry. © 2021 Tempus Publications. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

students performance Evaluate Team

Index Keywords

Teaching Curricula Students Multidisciplinary projects Engineering project Formula student Performance issues Team performance
Author Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Haskoli Islands, Reykjavik, Iceland
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Unnthorsson, Runar, On Improving Academic-Industry Collaboration, 2018 28th EAEEIE Annual Conference, EAEEIE 2018, (2018)
2 Societe Europeenne Pour La Formation Des Ingenieurs Sefi Annual Conference, (2016)
3 Meah, Kala, A Multidisciplinary Capstone Design Project to Satisfy ABET Student Outcomes, Education Research International, 2020, (2020)
4 Dawson, Jennifer, Experiences of using Formula SAE as a Capstone Design project, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, (2010)
5 Unnthorsson, Runar, On Authority in Academia, 2018 28th EAEEIE Annual Conference, EAEEIE 2018, (2018)
6 Engineering Education, (2006)
7 Liu, Peng, Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42, 6, pp. 553-568, (2012)
8 Culp, Gordon L., Understanding psychological type to improve project team performance, Journal of Management in Engineering, 17, 1, pp. 24-33, (2001)
9 Rouse, William Bill, The Role of Mental Models in Team Performance in Complex Systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22, 6, pp. 1296-1308, (1992)
10 Urban, Julie M., Effects of workload and structure on team processes and performance: Implications for complex team decision making, Human Factors, 38, 2, pp. 300-310, (1996)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85102714022
  • Language English