Article Green Open Access 2021

Multilevel design considerations for vocational curricula at the boundary of school and work

Journal of Curriculum Studies
Journal · Vol. 53 · Issue 6 · pp. 765-783
Abstract

This study focuses on the school–work connection from the perspective of curriculum design. The aim was to uncover considerations underpinning the design of learning environments in vocational education. The research took place in the Netherlands. A focus group methodology was chosen to elicit designers’ considerations, which generally remain largely implicit. These considerations concern the designable elements of learning environments: epistemic, spatial, temporal, and social elements. Design considerations were uncovered at each of the aggregation levels of a curriculum. At the macro-level, considerations referred to the connectivity between the contexts of school and work. Based on these considerations, different designs were chosen along the school–work continuum. At the meso-level, another continuum was found: the complexity in terms of practices involved in the learning environment. At the micro-level, concrete design considerations were revealed that designers take into account to strengthen the school–work connection. Thus, design considerations at three levels were made explicit. Moreover, the need for alignment between the designable elements and the curriculum levels became more apparent, leading to a deeper understanding of curriculum design for vocational education. This paper adds understanding of ways to strengthen the school–work connection and design future-proof vocational curricula. © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Vocational education workplace learning curriculum design alignment educational development

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculty of Educational Sciences, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands, Research Group Vocational Education, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands
Research Group Vocational Education, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Aguinis, Herman, Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies, Organizational Research Methods, 17, 4, pp. 351-371, (2014)
2 Akkerman, Sanne Floor, Boundary crossing and boundary objects, Review of Educational Research, 81, 2, pp. 132-169, (2011)
3 Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, (2014)
4 Arts, Margit, Boundary Crossing Support in Part-Time Higher Professional Education Programs, Vocations and Learning, 13, 2, pp. 215-243, (2020)
5 Averill, Jennifer Bates, Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry, Qualitative Health Research, 12, 6, pp. 855-866, (2002)
6 Baartman, Liesbeth K.J., VET students’ integration of knowledge engaged with in school-based and workplace-based learning environments in the Netherlands, Journal of Education and Work, 31, 2, pp. 204-217, (2018)
7 Bakker, Arthur, The learning potential of boundary crossing in the vocational curriculum, The Wiley Handbook of Vocational Education and Training, pp. 367-372, (2019)
8 Berner, Boel, Crossing boundaries and maintaining differences between school and industry: Forms of boundary-work in Swedish vocational education, Journal of Education and Work, 23, 1, pp. 27-42, (2010)
9 Teaching for Quality Learning at University, (1999)
10 Billett, Stephen Richard, Constituting the workplace curriculum, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 1, pp. 31-48, (2006)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
12
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers