Article Gold Open Access 2021

The self-initiated work adjustment for learning scale: development and validation

Journal of Managerial Psychology
Journal · Vol. 36 · Issue 6 · pp. 491-504
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to develop the self-initiated work adjustment for learning (SIWAL) scale that measures the adjustments that employees make in their work to enhance learning, based on theories and research on workplace learning, work adjustment and work design. Design/methodology/approach: The SIWAL scale was validated in two independent studies. Study 1 (n = 208) focused on the internal consistency and factor structure of the SIWAL scale. Study 2 (n = 178) re-examined the factorial structure using confirmatory factor analysis and investigated scale validity. Findings: In both studies, the SIWAL scale showed good psychometric characteristics, i.e. a clear two-factorial structure and internal reliable sub-scales. The findings also indicated convergent, divergent and concurrent validity. Research limitations/implications: Using the SIWAL scale, future research could focus on the individual, social and organizational predictors and outcomes of SIWAL, collect supervisor and peer ratings to further validate this self-report scale and investigate lower-educated workers. Practical implications: Organizations might try to enhance their employees' SIWAL through organizational policies, such as supportive leadership, and a learning climate. Originality/value: This study provides a first step toward a better understanding of what workers do to enhance their workplace learning. The study findings indicate that employees address two adaptive behaviors: adjusting job responsibilities and adjusting social interactions. © 2021, Joris van Ruysseveldt, Tonnie van Wiggen-Valkenburg, Karen van Dam.

Keywords

Author Keywords

workplace learning informal learning Job design Work adjustment

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
Open University, OU
The authors do not have any interests that might be interpreted as influencing the research, and APA ethical standards were followed in the conduct of the study. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The research obtained approval of the Ethical Research Committee (cETO) of the Open University (registration number: U2017/09062/HVM).
References 10 References
1 Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, (2002)
2 Ashford, Susan J., Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior organizations, Journal of Management, 29, 6, pp. 773-799, (2003)
3 Bagozzi, Richard P., On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 1, pp. 74-94, (1988)
4 Bakker, Arnold Bastiaan, The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 3, pp. 309-328, (2007)
5 Bandura, Albert, Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective, Annual Review of Psychology, 52, pp. 1-26, (2001)
6 Battistelli, Adalgisa, Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work-based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30, 3, pp. 361-381, (2019)
7 Bayl-Smith, Piers H., Maintenance of D-A fit through work adjustment behaviors: The moderating effect of work style fit, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, pp. 209-219, (2018)
8 Bezuijen, Xander M., Pygmalion and employee learning: The role of leader behaviors, Journal of Management, 35, 5, pp. 1248-1267, (2009)
9 Birdi, Kamal, Correlates and perceived outcomes of four types of employee development activity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 6, pp. 845-857, (1997)
10 Bolino, Mark C., Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 2, pp. 325-345, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
10
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers