Article Gold Open Access 2021

International curriculum comparison in vocational education and training: A collaborative development of an analysis instrument

International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 8 · Issue 4 · pp. 16-43
Abstract

Context: International comparative research on Vocational Education and Training (VET) is gaining importance, as global cooperation and mutual learning in VET grows. However, it is characterized by a high degree of complexity, due on one hand, to the heterogeneity of the VET sector, and on the other hand to the unique challenges of international comparisons. In addition, comparative research projects are increasingly conducted in the form of cross-border collaborations, which have their own particular organizational and methodological considerations, opportunities, and challenges. This paper presents an example of a cooperative research process, aimed at investigating the complex phenomenon of the competence-based approach in Russian and Chinese VET. In providing an example of developing an instrument for curriculum analysis and comparison, we discuss and reflect on the methodological and organizational peculiarities and challenges of the research process conducted collaboratively by an international team. Method: The instrument for analysis and comparison of curricular documents, was developed in an iterative multi-stage process, combining deductive and inductive steps. The embeddedness of the elements of a competence-based approach in curricular documents is investigated, using qualitative content analysis. To develop a coding frame, we started with a comprehensive partially systematic literature review of international, Russian and Chinese discourses on competence-based curricula. The frame was built on the selected model of competence-based education, and on accumulated results of the literature analysis of national discourses. Furthermore, during the first coding process, an iterative adaptation of the developed instrument took place. Results: The result of this process was the development of an analysis instrument which, on the one hand, is well-adapted to each national context and, on the other hand, allows a comparison of results along the same dimensions of analysis, in our case, elements of the competence-based approach in curriculum. Conclusion: Developing an analysis framework for a cross-cultural comparative investigation of such a diffuse and heterogeneous construct as the competence-based approach, can pose a methodological challenge for an international team of researchers. However, an effective application of own team resources such as proficiency in different languages, insider and outsider perspectives, along with continuous intensive communication and a flexible, iterative research process, allows development of a well-adapted analysis instrument for international comparison. © 2021 European Research Network Vocational Education and Training. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Competence-based education VET vocational education and training curriculum Analysis instrument International comparative research

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Universität zu Köln, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Osnabrück University, Osnabruck, Niedersachsen, Germany
Institute of Education, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Institute of Vocational and Adult Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Adamson, Bob, Comparing curricula, Comparative Education Research: Approaches and Methods: Second Edition, pp. 309-332, (2014)
2 Baumeler, Carmen, Competence-Based Vocational Education and Training and Its Cultural Context Sensitivity, European Education, 51, 1, pp. 1-15, (2019)
3 Weltweite Erziehung Festgabe Fur Friedrich Schneider Zum 80 Geburtstag, (1961)
4 Biemans, Harm J.A., Competence-based vet in the netherlands: Background and pitfalls, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56, 4, pp. 523-538, (2004)
5 Vocational Education Purposes Traditions and Prospects, (2011)
6 Boahin, Peter, Competency-based training in international perspective: Comparing the implementation processes towards the achievement of employability, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46, 6, pp. 839-858, (2014)
7 Boud, David J., Reflection: Turning experience into learning, Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, pp. 1-170, (2013)
8 Bowen, Glenn A., Document analysis as a qualitative research method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9, 2, pp. 27-40, (2009)
9 Boyd, Evelyn M., Reflective learning: Key to Learning from Experience, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23, 2, pp. 99-117, (1983)
10 Zhong Guo Zhi Ye Ji Shu Jiao Yu Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
18
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers