Article Gold Open Access 2021

Knowing me, knowing you: Humanitas in work-integrated learning during adversity

Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Journal · Vol. 18 · Issue 7 · pp. 159-176
Abstract

Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) is a variety of learning opportunities that can extend beyond the application of theory to practice, to include complex situational, personal, material, and organisational factors. Central to forming successful WIL experiences is the partnership, support, and collaboration extended by all key stakeholders. The Covid-19 pandemic disrupted WIL experiences, with many developed partnerships and sustained practices being abruptly impacted. In 2020, a multidisciplinary group of Australasian WIL academics, administrators and students joined in weekly virtual coffee chats to share concerns and experiences during this rapidly changing educational landscape. These conversations led to establishing a Small Significant Online Network Group (SSONG) and became the basis for this article. We explored the lessons learned from WIL practitioners to be better informed of the practice of WIL and, generally, to examine the role of collaborations in higher education. Using a collaborative autoethnographic approach, this study incorporated written reflections on WIL experiences during COVID-19 lockdowns, followed by Zoom conversations to gain deeper insights. All data was aggregated and analysed thematically, both inductively and deductively, to interpret the practice experiences of individuals in their socio-cultural contexts. This article intends to demonstrate how creative solutions, such as adopting a HUMANE framework, become valuable paradigms. These enhance and nurture relationships between all WIL stakeholders, to enrich and sustain WIL experiences for all. Practitioner Notes 1. Successful WIL relationships rely on collaboration between all stakeholders to ensure sustainability. 2. Adopting a humanistic approach, in this case, the HUMANE framework, has positive outcomes for WIL stakeholders and higher education. 3. A SSONG is an effective mechanism for supporting collaboration in any educational context facing disruption. 4. Technology enables WIL stakeholders to connect globally, and through these connections, reflect on differing experiences to broaden creative responses to challenges. 5. The power of connecting and collaborating provides opportunities to work together and enhances agency, performance, and outcomes that benefit WIL and higher education. © 2021, University of Wollongong. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) Collaborative autoethnography Student-Centred HUMANE framework Humanistic lens

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, AUK, New Zealand
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Amiet, Danielle Lalaine, Exploring attitudes, beliefs and practices of academic staff towards undergraduate career development in non-vocational courses, Higher Education Research and Development, 40, 5, pp. 885-900, (2021)
2 Aprile, Kerry Therese, The WIL to learn: students’ perspectives on the impact of work-integrated learning placements on their professional readiness, Higher Education Research and Development, 39, 5, pp. 869-882, (2020)
3 Arnold, Lydia, Problematising pedagogical action research in formal teaching courses and academic development: a collaborative autoethnography, Educational Action Research, 29, 2, pp. 328-345, (2021)
4 Teaching in Higher Education, (1999)
5 A Will to Learn Being A Student in an Age of Uncertainty, (2007)
6 Conference Board of Canada, (2020)
7 Billett, Stephen Richard, Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation, and engagement, Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 1, pp. 27-43, (2002)
8 Billett, Stephen Richard, Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 34, 7, pp. 827-843, (2009)
9 Braun, Virginia, One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18, 3, pp. 328-352, (2021)
10 Brown, Jason L., Relations between graduates’ learning experiences and employment outcomes: a cautionary note for institutional performance indicators, International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 22, 1, pp. 137-156, (2022)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
5
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers