Review Gold Open Access 2021

Competency-based anesthesiology teaching: comparison of programs in Brazil, Canada and the United States

Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition)
Journal · Vol. 71 · Issue 2 · pp. 162-170
Abstract

In 2017, the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) and the National Medical Residency Committee (CNRM) presented a joint competence matrix to train and evaluate physicians specializing in Anesthesiology, which was enforced in 2019. The competency-based curriculum aims to train residents in relation to certain results, in that residents are considered capable when they are able to act in an appropriate and effective manner within certain standards of performance. Canada and the United States (US) also use competency-based curriculum to train their professionals. In Canada, the format is the basis for using an evaluation method known as Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA), in which the mentor assesses residents’ capacity to perform certain tasks, classified in 5 levels. The US, in turn, uses Milestones as evaluation, in which competencies and sub-competencies are assessed according to residents’ progress during training. The present article aims to describe and compare the different competency-based curriculum and the evaluation methods used in the three countries, and proposes a reflection on future paths for medical education in Anesthesiology in Brazil. © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia

Keywords

Author Keywords

medical education competency-based curriculum Anesthesiology Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) Medical residency Milestones

Index Keywords

adult female human male medical education curriculum United States physician review human experiment Canada mentor resident Brazil anesthesiology
Author Affiliations
Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States, Department of Internal Medicine, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Centre, Bronx, NY, United States
Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
Dor e Medicina Intensiva, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Anest Rev, (2018)
2 International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice Based Learning, (2014)
3 Hager, Paul J., The competence affair, or why vocational education and training urgently needs a new understanding of learning, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56, 3, pp. 409-433, (2004)
4 Martin, Leslie J., The impact of entrustment assessments on feedback and learning: Trainee perspectives, Medical Education, 54, 4, pp. 328-336, (2020)
5 Englander, Robert M., From theory to practice: Making entrustable professional activities come to life in the context of milestones, Academic Medicine, 89, 10, pp. 1321-1323, (2014)
6 Wisman-Zwarter, Nienke, Transforming the learning outcomes of anaesthesiology training into entrustable professional activities, European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 33, 8, pp. 559-567, (2016)
7 J Grad Med Educ, (2014)
8 McCloskey, Cindy B., Entrustable Professional Activities for Pathology: Recommendations From the College of American Pathologists Graduate Medical Education Committee, Academic Pathology, 4, (2017)
9 ten Cate, Olle Th J., Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training, Medical Education, 39, 12, pp. 1176-1177, (2005)
10 Practical Guide to the Evaluation of Clinical Competence, (2008)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
7
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers