Conference paper Gold Open Access 2021

The simulation of divayana formula calculation to determine the priority of recommendation in evaluation activities

Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Conference · Vol. 1810 · Issue 1 · Art. 012044
Abstract

Evaluation activities are not carried out to determine whether to pass or not the program being evaluated. Evaluation activities tend to provide recommendations for improving or completion of the constraints that are still found in the program being evaluated. The problem that often occurs in the field is the difficulty in determining recommendation priority for each evaluation aspect. Therefore, a precise and accurate formula is needed to determine the recommendation priority in an evaluation activity. Hence, the evaluation results will be more optimal. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a DIVAYANA formula calculation simulation in determining recommendation priority. This research approach was evaluative with research stages that follow the DIVAYANA model stages. This research focused on the DIVAYANA formula part which lies at the Nominate stage. The subjects involved in the initial data collection were ten students from the Department of Informatics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. The subjects involved in determining the weight for the evaluation component were four experts. The tool used for initial data collection and expert weight determination was questionnaires. The analysis technique of this research was done by checking the correctness of the DIVAYANA formula calculation based on case proof. The results showed that the process of DIVAYANA formula calculating simulation had been running well as evidenced by the accuracy of the results of determining priority recommendation. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Apprentices Education computing Evaluation results Research approach Surveys Data acquisition Accurate formulas Analysis techniques Calculating simulation Evaluation activity Informatics education Weight determination
Author Affiliations
Department of Informatics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Grant: 760/UN48.16/LT/2020
The author would like to express his deep gratitude to the Head of Research and Community Service, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha who had provided the opportunity and funded this research as evidenced by the research grant contract no. 760/UN48.16/LT/2020.
References 10 References
1 American Journal of Evaluation, (2019)
2 Karabatzaki, Zoe, Mobile application tools for students in secondary education. An evaluation study, International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12, 2, pp. 142-161, (2018)
3 Karayaka, Hayrettin Bora, The evaluation of a new hybrid flipped classroom approach to teaching power electronics, Global Journal of Engineering Education, 17, 2, pp. 61-69, (2015)
4 Kong, Fanwen, Evaluation model of adaptive teaching ability of college art teachers, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15, 9, pp. 143-155, (2020)
5 Bennett, Anna, Access and equity programme provision-evaluation in Australian higher education: a what matters approach, Educational Research and Evaluation, 24, 8, pp. 523-537, (2018)
6 Al-Azzemy, Asma F.T., Evaluating cognitive, metacognitive and social listening comprehension teaching strategies in Kuwaiti classrooms, Heliyon, 5, 2, (2019)
7 Taut, Sandy M., Evaluating the quality of teaching: can there be valid differentiation in the middle of the performance distribution?, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30, 3, pp. 328-348, (2019)
8 Adom, Dickson, Test, measurement, and evaluation: Understanding and use of the concepts in education, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9, 1, pp. 109-119, (2020)
9 Varga-Atkins, Tünde, Focus Group meets Nominal Group Technique: an effective combination for student evaluation?, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54, 4, pp. 289-300, (2017)
10 Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, (2018)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
4
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers