Article 2021

Introducing Intergenerational Co-creation into Welfare Design Practice Course; 以青銀共創導入福祉設計實務專題課程

Journal of Design
Journal · Vol. 26 · Issue 2 · pp. 93-110
Abstract

Based on the observations in practice courses, most of the designs from students are based on their own experiences and thoughts. It is also found that the lack of subsequent actual evaluation often leads to the deviation of the design results from the user's needs. Therefore, this study takes the "Welfare Design Market Trends" as a study example, which adopts design-based learning as the curriculum structure, linking the aging issues in real society, and developing innovative welfare products in a way that is co-created with the senior. This research adopts action research methods including plan, act, observation, and reflection. After two rounds of teaching practice, the following results were obtained: (1) In the process of intergenerational co-creation, students are not only designing for users, but designing with them. The senior play the role of demand provider and co-creator at the same time. As students understand the needs of the target group better, they can come up with design ideas closer to their needs. (2) The prototyping process must consider the physical characteristics of the elders. Increasing the number of prototype iterations will help improve the chances of success of the design project. (3) The design-based learning courses with cross-disciplinary experts who have been in contact with users for a long time can help to produce solutions that meet the needs of users. Finally, the aim of this research is to be used as a reference for a design-based learning curriculum structure for education organizations with limited resources. © 2021, Chinese Institute of Design. All right reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Design-based learning Intergenerational Co-creation Welfare Design

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Product Design, Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Change by Design how Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, (2009)
2 Cappelen, Birgitta, Vitalising health promoting technology for elderly in design education, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, E and PDE 2018, (2018)
3 Carroll, Maureen P., Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 29, 1, pp. 37-53, (2010)
4 Yu-Hung, Chien, The Different Learning Outcomes of High School and College Students on a 3D-Printing STEAM Engineering Design Curriculum, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 6, pp. 1047-1064, (2018)
5 Clough, Barbara Stolze, Broadening perspectives on learning activities in later life, Educational Gerontology, 18, 5, pp. 447-459, (1992)
6 Action Research Essentials, (2009)
7 Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Traditions, (1998)
8 Eleven Lessons Managing Design in Eleven Global Companies, (2007)
9 Doppelt, Yaron, Engagement and achievements: A case study of design-based learning in a science context, Journal of Technology Education, 19, 2, pp. 22-39, (2008)
10 Dym, Clive L., Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning, Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1, pp. 103-120, (2005)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85110065280
  • Language Chinese