Article 2022

Perceived influence of mechanical engineering students’ work placement experiences on their occupational competency and self-efficacy

International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education
Journal · Vol. 50 · Issue 1 · pp. 197-216
Abstract

This paper proposes a qualitative systems dynamics model that explains how students’ work placement experiences either enhance or hinder the growth of their occupational competency and self-efficacy. The model is developed from qualitative analysis of work placement experiences of mechanical engineering students from a South African university of technology. Findings from the analysis show that students’ occupational competency and self-efficacy could be considered emergent outcomes of interactions of the learning environment, mentor posture, mentor capacity, mentor availability, meaningfulness of work, scope of work, agency, doing work, co-participating, participation trajectory and performance trajectory. The explanation of the factors and social mechanisms that influence students’ occupational competency and self-efficacy that is offered by the qualitative systems dynamics model would enable the implementation of work placement programs in a manner that would promote rather than hinder the growth of these two indicators of student employability. © The Author(s) 2020.

Keywords

Author Keywords

self-efficacy Work placement occupational competency systems dynamics

Index Keywords

Students Self Efficacy Computer aided instruction qualitative analysis Learning environments Mechanical engineering students Work placement Systems dynamics
Author Affiliations
University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Developing Learning Professionals, (2011)
2 Wilton, Nick, The impact of work placements on skills development and career outcomes for business and management graduates, Studies in Higher Education, 37, 5, pp. 603-620, (2012)
3 Rook, Laura, Viewing WIL in business schools through a new lens: Moving to the edge of chaos with complexity theory, Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 18, 2, (2016)
4 Jackson, Denise A., The contribution of work-integrated learning to undergraduate employability skill outcomes, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14, 2, pp. 99-115, (2013)
5 Smith, Calvin Douglas, Placement quality has a greater impact on employability than placement structure or duration, International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 20, 1, pp. 15-29, (2019)
6 Jackson, Denise A., Testing a model of undergraduate competence in employability skills and its implications for stakeholders, Journal of Education and Work, 27, 2, pp. 220-242, (2014)
7 Edwards, Matt, The impact of placements on students' self-efficacy, Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 4, 3, pp. 228-241, (2014)
8 Journal of Cooperative Education and Internships, (2013)
9 Walther, Joachim, Engineering competence? An interpretive investigation of engineering students' professional formation, Journal of Engineering Education, 100, 4, pp. 703-740, (2011)
10 Cooper, Lesley L., Work Integrated Learning: A guide to effective practice, Work Integrated Learning: A Guide to Effective Practice, pp. 1-221, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
7
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers