Article Green Open Access 2022

Explaining gaps in educational transitions between migrant and native school leavers

Applied Economics
Journal · Vol. 54 · Issue 15 · pp. 1759-1786
Abstract

This paper analyzes the reasons for the gaps in post-schooling transitions between migrant and native pupils in Germany. While differences in parental background or skills partly explain the gaps, they are not sufficient. Conditional on these factors, there is a ‘polarization’ of educational choices: migrants are more likely to attend tertiary education, less likely to attend vocational education, and more likely to end without qualified training than their background and skills would predict. This is driven by the migrants’ more academic career aspirations and expectations before leaving school. On the one hand, these higher ambitions allow high-skilled migrants to achieve tertiary education despite their less favourable background. On the other hand, low-skilled migrants who in Germany’s tracked school system do not have the option to enter tertiary education, may be diverted from vocational training as a more viable alternative. Finally, possible explanations for the different career plans are discussed. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

school-to-work-transition aspirations Expectations Migrant youth

Index Keywords

higher education Vocational education Germany skilled labor young population immigrant
Author Affiliations
School of Business and Economics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG
Grant: 692/11-1
Funding text 1: I thank Bernd Fitzenberger, Alexandra Spitz-Oener and seminar participants at Humboldt-University Berlin and IAB Nuremberg for helpful comments. I acknowledge financial support by the DFG through the project ”Education and Vocational Training, Transitions and Labor Market Outcomes” (No. Fi 692/11-1). All possible errors and omissions are my sole responsibility.; Funding text 2: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Education and Vocational Training, Transitions and Labor Market Outcomes, No. Fi 692/11-1]. I thank Bernd Fitzenberger, Alexandra Spitz-Oener and seminar participants at Humboldt-University Berlin and IAB Nuremberg for helpful comments. I acknowledge financial support by the DFG through the project ”Education and Vocational Training, Transitions and Labor Market Outcomes” (No. Fi 692/11-1). All possible errors and omissions are my sole responsibility. This paper uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS. Starting Cohort Grade 9, doi:10.5157/NEPS:SC4:9.0.0. From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS is carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network.; Funding text 3: This paper uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS. Starting Cohort Grade 9, doi:10.5157/NEPS:SC4:9.0.0. From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS is carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF
Funding text 1: I thank Bernd Fitzenberger, Alexandra Spitz-Oener and seminar participants at Humboldt-University Berlin and IAB Nuremberg for helpful comments. I acknowledge financial support by the DFG through the project ”Education and Vocational Training, Transitions and Labor Market Outcomes” (No. Fi 692/11-1). All possible errors and omissions are my sole responsibility.; Funding text 2: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Education and Vocational Training, Transitions and Labor Market Outcomes, No. Fi 692/11-1]. I thank Bernd Fitzenberger, Alexandra Spitz-Oener and seminar participants at Humboldt-University Berlin and IAB Nuremberg for helpful comments. I acknowledge financial support by the DFG through the project ”Education and Vocational Training, Transitions and Labor Market Outcomes” (No. Fi 692/11-1). All possible errors and omissions are my sole responsibility. This paper uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS. Starting Cohort Grade 9, doi:10.5157/NEPS:SC4:9.0.0. From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS is carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network.; Funding text 3: This paper uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS. Starting Cohort Grade 9, doi:10.5157/NEPS:SC4:9.0.0. From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS is carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network.
Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsverläufe, LIfBi
Funding text 1: I thank Bernd Fitzenberger, Alexandra Spitz-Oener and seminar participants at Humboldt-University Berlin and IAB Nuremberg for helpful comments. I acknowledge financial support by the DFG through the project ”Education and Vocational Training, Transitions and Labor Market Outcomes” (No. Fi 692/11-1). All possible errors and omissions are my sole responsibility.; Funding text 2: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Education and Vocational Training, Transitions and Labor Market Outcomes, No. Fi 692/11-1]. I thank Bernd Fitzenberger, Alexandra Spitz-Oener and seminar participants at Humboldt-University Berlin and IAB Nuremberg for helpful comments. I acknowledge financial support by the DFG through the project ”Education and Vocational Training, Transitions and Labor Market Outcomes” (No. Fi 692/11-1). All possible errors and omissions are my sole responsibility. This paper uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS. Starting Cohort Grade 9, doi:10.5157/NEPS:SC4:9.0.0. From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS is carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network.; Funding text 3: This paper uses data from the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS. Starting Cohort Grade 9, doi:10.5157/NEPS:SC4:9.0.0. From 2008 to 2013, NEPS data was collected as part of the Framework Program for the Promotion of Empirical Educational Research funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). As of 2014, NEPS is carried out by the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories (LIfBi) at the University of Bamberg in cooperation with a nationwide network.
References 10 References
1 Ammermueller, Andreas, Poor background or low returns? Why immigrant students in Germany perform so poorly in the programme for international student assessment, Education Economics, 15, 2, pp. 215-230, (2007)
2 Arcidiacono, Peter S., Modeling college major choices using elicited measures of expectations and counterfactuals, Journal of Econometrics, 166, 1, pp. 3-16, (2012)
3 Attanasio, Orazio Pedro, Education choices and returns to schooling: Mothers' and youths' subjective expectations and their role by gender, Journal of Development Economics, 109, pp. 203-216, (2014)
4 Attanasio, Orazio Pedro, Education choices and returns on the labor and marriage markets: Evidence from data on subjective expectations, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 140, pp. 35-55, (2017)
5 Autor, David H., Family disadvantage and the gender gap in behavioral and educational outcomes, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11, 3, pp. 338-381, (2019)
6 Baert, Stijn, Pure ethnic gaps in educational attainment and school to work transitions: When do they arise?, Economics of Education Review, 36, pp. 276-294, (2013)
7 Belfield, Chris, What Drives Enrolment Gaps in Further Education? The Role of Beliefs in Sequential Schooling Decisions, Economica, 87, 346, pp. 490-529, (2020)
8 Belzil, Christian, Education and early career outcomes of second-generation immigrants in France, Labour Economics, 17, 1, pp. 101-110, (2010)
9 Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, (2011)
10 Socio Economic Gaps in University Enrollment the Role of Perceived Pecuniary and Non Pecuniary Returns, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers