Article 2022

Feedback and human learning: Preliminary insights from disengaged students

Human Systems Management
Journal · Vol. 41 · Issue 1 · pp. 17-25
Abstract

Background: How to reconnect the disengaged learners has been a major challenge for human learning. Motivating the disengaged learners through traditional interventions has not been effective. Objective: The study aims to examine whether feedback from an external unit would be more persuasive for the disengaged learners. The perception on a lack of learning stems from poor attitude of learning, poor behavior, laziness, and lack of learning ability and attention. Methods: A foreign business community has collaborated with two Bangkok Metropolitan Administration schools since 2016 on creating constructive and indirect feedback. There were 337 students from both schools participated in the survey. 163 students participated in the revised practices while 174 students attended the traditional practices. Results: The results show the gap between the two groups on the effects from constructive and indirect feedback. The disengaged students from the revised pedagogy show that they are attracted to constructive feedback and indirect feedback more. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that, unlike the traditional paradigm, the disengaged students are perceptive to external feedback. The findings show some consistency with previous studies. Integrating external feedback can attract the attention from the disengaged students which could potentially contribute to human learning. © 2022 - IOS Press. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

constructive feedback disengaged students Human learning indirect feedback

Index Keywords

Students Learning abilities Bangkok constructive feedback Human learning Business community Disengaged student Feedback learning Indirect feedback
Author Affiliations
Department of Industrial Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
Institute of Management and Quality Sciences, Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Sklodowskiej w Lublinie, Lublin, LU, Poland
Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Oulu University, Linnanmaa, Finland
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Carless, David Robert, Differing perceptions in the feedback process, Studies in Higher Education, 31, 2, pp. 219-233, (2006)
2 Chan, Kam Ho, On-Site Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development, International Journal of Science Education, 37, 8, pp. 1246-1278, (2015)
3 International Journal of Research Studies in Education, (2014)
4 Clardy, Alan, 70-20-10 and the Dominance of Informal Learning: A Fact in Search of Evidence, Human Resource Development Review, 17, 2, pp. 153-178, (2018)
5 David, Solomon Arulraj, Curriculum innovation for postgraduate programs: Perspectives of postgraduate learners, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 28, 3, pp. 297-316, (2020)
6 Deep, Sadia, Study on problem-based learning towards improving soft skills of students in effective communication class, International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 25, 1, pp. 17-34, (2019)
7 Faikhamta, Chatree, Fifth year pre-service science teachers' struggles with and learning about teaching science through a-year-long field experience, Kasetsart Journal - Social Sciences, 32, 1, pp. 140-147, (2011)
8 Faikhamta, Chatree, Thai pre-service science teachers engaging action research during their fifth year internship, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35, 2, pp. 259-273, (2015)
9 Ferris, Dana R., Error feedback in L2 writing classes How explicit does it need to be?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 3, pp. 161-184, (2001)
10 Ferguson, H. Bruce, The impact of poverty on educational outcomes for children, Paediatrics and Child Health, 12, 8, pp. 701-706, (2007)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers