Conference paper 2022

The Future Nexus of Computational Thinking Education: A Preliminary Systematic Review of Reviews

Proceedings - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2022
Conference · pp. 548-553
Abstract

Recent years have seen a high volume of computational thinking (CT) review studies. However, there have been no existing studies that map these reviews with the goal of achieving comprehensive understanding of the field of CT. This paper utilizes Tikva & Tambouris' (2021) K-12 CT research domain conceptual model as the basis for identifying and defining CT reviews, then maps the identified 38 CT reviews onto the identified domains. We pinpoint eight potential future review topics, including "communities"of tools, "modeling simulations,""problem-solving"and "scaffolding"of learning strategies, "demographic attributes"of factors, "practices"and "perspectives"of the knowledge-based areas, and the "teacher training"of capacity building. We also examine the topical keywords of the reviews and identify that the scope of the term "unplugged"is vaguely defined among the existing research, suggesting a need to refine the definition of this frequently discussed topic so as to be able to more effectively conduct supplementary reviews. Our results help to better understand the CT review field and formulate future directions. © 2022 IEEE.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Computational thinking K-12 education review of reviews

Index Keywords

Learning systems Personnel training Systematic Review Problem-solving Knowledge based systems K-12 education conceptual model Computational thinkings Scaffolds High volumes Modeling simulation Research domains Review of review Tool models
Author Affiliations
Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
SUNY Cortland, Cortland, NY, United States
National Institute of Education, Singapore City, Singapore
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Mindstorms Children Computers and Powerful Ideas, (1980)
2 Wing, Jeannette M., Computational thinking and thinking about computing, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366, 1881, pp. 3717-3725, (2008)
3 Tikva, Christina, Mapping computational thinking through programming in K-12 education: A conceptual model based on a systematic literature Review, Computers and Education, 162, (2021)
4 Buitrago-Flórez, Francisco Javier, Changing a Generation’s Way of Thinking: Teaching Computational Thinking Through Programming, Review of Educational Research, 87, 4, pp. 834-860, (2017)
5 Fidai, Aamir, “Scratch”-ing computational thinking with Arduino: A meta-analysis, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, (2020)
6 Fagerlund, Janne, Computational thinking in programming with Scratch in primary schools: A systematic review, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29, 1, pp. 12-28, (2021)
7 Zhang, Yanjun, Educational Robots Improve K-12 Students’ Computational Thinking and STEM Attitudes: Systematic Review, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59, 7, pp. 1450-1481, (2021)
8 Grover, Shuchi, Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field, Educational Researcher, 42, 1, pp. 38-43, (2013)
9 Shute, Valerie J., Demystifying computational thinking, Educational Research Review, 22, pp. 142-158, (2017)
10 Hsu, Tingchia, How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature, Computers and Education, 126, pp. 296-310, (2018)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers