Article Gold Open Access 2022

“New normal” at work in a post-COVID world: work–life balance and labor markets

Policy and Society
Journal · Vol. 41 · Issue 1 · pp. 155-167
Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic has interrupted labor markets, triggering massive and instant series of experimentations with flexible work arrangements, and new relationships to centralized working environments. These approaches have laid the basis for the “new normal,” likely extending into the organization of work in the post-pandemic era. These new arrangements, especially flexible work arrangements, have challenged traditional relationships with employees and employers, work time and working hours, the work–life balance (WLB), and the relationship of individuals to work. This paper investigates how labor markets have been interrupted due to the pandemic, focusing especially on manual (blue-collar) and nonmanual (white-collar) work and the future of the WLB, along with exploring the projected deviations that are driving a foreseeable future policy revolution in work and employment. This paper argues that although hybrid and remote working would be more popular in the post-pandemic for nonmanual work, it will not be “one size fits all” solution. Traditional work practices will remain, and offices will not completely disappear. Manual labor will continue current work practices with increased demands. Employers’ attention to employees’ WLB in the new normal will target employees’ motivation and achieving better WLB. These trends for the labor market and WLB are classified into three categories—those that are predicated on changes that were already underway but were accelerated with arrival of the pandemic (“acceleration”); those that represent normalization of what were once considered avant-garde ways of work (“normalization”); and those that represent modification or alteration of pre-pandemic set-up (“remodelling”). © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

Keywords

Author Keywords

work–life balance labor markets work flexibility coronavirus disease employment practices

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Asian and Policy Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Funding & Acknowledgements
Education University of Hong Kong, EdUHK
The research was supported by a “Departmental Small Research Grant” funded by Department of Asian and Policy Studies, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
References 10 References
1 Adamovic, Mladen, An employee-focused human resource management perspective for the management of global virtual teams, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29, 14, pp. 2159-2187, (2018)
2 Guardian, (2021)
3 undefined, (2020)
4 undefined, (2021)
5 undefined, (2021)
6 undefined, (2021)
7 undefined, (2021)
8 Bloom, Nicholas Dagen, Does working from home work? Evidence from a chinese experiment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 1, pp. 165-218, (2015)
9 Reimagining the Office and Work Life After Covid 19, (2020)
10 World Economic Forum, (2021)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
235
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers