Article Gold Open Access 2022

Enhancing Early Childhood Educators’ Skills in Co-regulating Children’s Emotions: A Collaborative Learning Program

Frontiers in Education
Journal · Vol. 7 · Art. 865161
Abstract

The aim of this article is to introduce a research-based work-integrated collaborative learning program that focuses on early childhood education and care (ECEC) professionals’ skills in co-regulation of emotions. The collaborative learning program draws on the theoretical framework that acknowledges the situated and socially shared nature of regulated learning and emotion regulation as well as years of research highlighting the importance of versatile and sensitive adults in supporting children’s learning of regulation skills during their early years. The program aims to improve professionals’ shared awareness of children’s emotion regulation development and abilities to identify and develop practices that support children in learning these skills, so that professionals can provide conscious and consistent co-regulation of emotions for children in everyday interactions. The design of the program has been developed by considering the aspects of effective collaborative and professional learning. This paper focuses on describing the theoretical grounding and implementation of a 32-week long collaborative learning program for ECEC professionals in Northern Finland (N = 450). Also, the development of a video-stimulated questionnaire (VSQ) for assessment of professionals’ learning during the program will be described. VSQ measures professionals’ abilities to identify and interpret everyday ECEC interactions from the point of view of (co-)regulation of emotions. Developing research-based collaborative programs that increase systematic support for children to learn regulation skills is essential, as these skills affect children’s lives well into adulthood. They set a basis for children’s learning and social skills and general wellbeing. © © 2022 Mänty, Kinnunen, Rinta-Homi and Koivuniemi.

Keywords

Author Keywords

collaborative learning Professional learning early childhood education Emotion regulation co-regulation

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit, Oulun Yliopisto, Oulu, North Ostrobothnia, Finland
Funding & Acknowledgements
Opetushallitus, EDUFI
Grant: 352/50/2020
Phases 5 and 6 (Reflect and Consolidate) were dedicated to reflection as well a further planning and consolidation of practices. In Phase 5, professionals reflected on their learning process to identify good practices and developmental needs for improving practices at individual, team, and ECEC center levels. This was supported by different collaborative tasks, discussions, and materials. Furthermore, the teams were prompted to collaboratively plan emotionally supportive practices and activities to support everyday interactions. Finally, in Phase 6, the participants were supported to put these plans into action and to develop long-term pedagogy of emotion regulation support. The participants were prompted to continue their own developmental and consolidation work with the theoretical support provided during the program (see ). The aims, therefore, were to make these developed pedagogical practices a part of educators’ everyday working routine and to also train new workers in these themes.
Opetushallitus, EDUFI
Phases 5 and 6 (Reflect and Consolidate) were dedicated to reflection as well a further planning and consolidation of practices. In Phase 5, professionals reflected on their learning process to identify good practices and developmental needs for improving practices at individual, team, and ECEC center levels. This was supported by different collaborative tasks, discussions, and materials. Furthermore, the teams were prompted to collaboratively plan emotionally supportive practices and activities to support everyday interactions. Finally, in Phase 6, the participants were supported to put these plans into action and to develop long-term pedagogy of emotion regulation support. The participants were prompted to continue their own developmental and consolidation work with the theoretical support provided during the program (see ). The aims, therefore, were to make these developed pedagogical practices a part of educators’ everyday working routine and to also train new workers in these themes.
References 10 References
1 Alonzo, Alicia C., Declarative and dynamic pedagogical content knowledge as elicited through two video-based interview methods, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 8, pp. 1259-1286, (2016)
2 Andersen, Per Normann, Art of learning - An art based intervention aimed at improving children's executive functions, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, JULY, (2019)
3 Aubé, Caroline, Flow experience and team performance: The role of team goal commitment and information exchange, Motivation and Emotion, 38, 1, pp. 120-130, (2014)
4 Bailey, Craig S., Teachers’ consistency of emotional support moderates the association between young children's regulation capacities and their preschool adjustment, Psychology in the Schools, 59, 6, pp. 1051-1074, (2022)
5 Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J., Research Review: Genetic vulnerability or differential susceptibility in child development: The case of attachment, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 48, 12, pp. 1160-1173, (2007)
6 Bakhtiar, Aishah, Regulation and socio-emotional interactions in a positive and a negative group climate, Metacognition and Learning, 13, 1, pp. 57-90, (2018)
7 Bakkenes, Inge, Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers, Learning and Instruction, 20, 6, pp. 533-548, (2010)
8 Barron, Brigid J.S., When smart groups fail, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 3, pp. 307-359, (2003)
9 Becker, Eva S., The importance of teachers' emotions and instructional behavior for their students' emotions - An experience sampling analysis, Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, pp. 15-26, (2014)
10 Blair, Clancy B., School readiness and self-regulation: A developmental psychobiological approach, Annual Review of Psychology, 66, pp. 711-731, (2015)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
6
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers