Article Gold Open Access 2025

Dual Learning Dynamics: Career Options for Agri-Food Students in Kazakhstan

International Journal of Training and Development
Journal · Vol. 29 · Issue 3 · pp. 328-342
Abstract

The successful implementation of the German-originated dual learning system in various national settings inspired Kazakhstan to introduce this approach to address the shortage of specialists. The self-employed status of professionals in the agri-food industry raises concerns about the intentions of young individuals to remain in the industry. This study aims to identify factors influencing the intentions of students and graduates to remain with the same employer in the agri-food industry, change employers in the same industry or leave the industry altogether. The study evaluated 651 learners undertaking dual learning (hence dual) and 217 learners undertaking traditional education (hence non-dual). Kirkpatrick's training evaluation model provided the theoretical framework for designing satisfaction dimensions potentially influencing the career intentions of students and graduates. Multinomial Logistic Regression was used to examine the career intentions of both dual and non-dual groups. The dual learners demonstrated a stronger association between tested factors (satisfaction and motivation) and intention to remain with the company/industry than the non-dual learners. Despite positive outcomes in retaining skilled professionals, concerns remain regarding the career intentions of young people in the agri-food industry. Stakeholders should provide career development opportunities and incentives to attract and retain young individuals within the agri-food sector. © 2025 The Author(s). International Journal of Training and Development published by Brian Towers (BRITOW) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

career intentions dual learning unemployment

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
School of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Alsalamah, Aljawharah, Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four-level model of training criteria to evaluate training programmes for head teachers, Education Sciences, 11, 3, (2021)
2 Alshynbayeva, Zhuldyz, On anticipatory development of dual education based on the systemic approach, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11, 18, pp. 12540-12550, (2016)
3 Beattie, James Renwick, Exploration of Principal Component Analysis: Deriving Principal Component Analysis Visually Using Spectra, Applied Spectroscopy, 75, 4, pp. 361-375, (2021)
4 Beckmann, Janina, Why do they leave? Examining dropout behaviour in gender-atypical vocational education and training in Germany, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 77, 2, pp. 297-321, (2025)
5 Bessey, Donata, Staying within or leaving the apprenticeship system? Revisions of educational choices in apprenticeship training, Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik, 235, 6, pp. 539-552, (2015)
6 Billett, Stephen Richard, Enhancing the standing of vocational education and the occupations it serves: Australia, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 72, 2, pp. 270-296, (2020)
7 Bulasheva, Ainur, Advancing the dual learning system in Kazakhstan: Perspectives of agri-business sector employers, International Journal of Training and Development, 28, 4, pp. 404-429, (2024)
8 Number and Wages of Employees in the Republic of Kazakhstan IV Quarter of 2023, (2023)
9 Employment and Unemployment, (2013)
10 Statistics of Education Science and Innovation, (2023)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers