Article Gold Open Access 2022

Supporting reflection to improve learning from self-generated concept maps

Metacognition and Learning
Journal · Vol. 17 · Issue 3 · pp. 691-713
Abstract

Creating concept maps is considered to be a powerful means for learning. It requires students to systematically organize and integrate their knowledge, which can foster meaningful learning. However, students scarcely spontaneously engage in the (meta)cognitive processes necessary for effective knowledge integration, such as reflection, which can hamper the effectiveness of concept mapping for learning. This study explores the effect of additional support that stimulates reflection by means of expert examples, reflection prompts, and classroom discussion. First-year technical vocational students (N = 144, M<inf>age</inf> = 17.5 years) studied electricity-related topics in an online learning environment and created concept maps about their knowledge. Students’ concept maps were supplemented with either (1) no support (control condition), (2) an expert example (a combined concept map, containing their own and an expert example concept map, with differences highlighted), (3) an expert example and reflection prompts students had to process individually, (4) an expert example and reflection prompts students had to process individually after a teacher-guided classroom discussion. Students in the classroom discussion condition showed higher learning gains compared to all other conditions. This can be explained by the quality of their reflection, which proved to be a significant predictor of learning gain. © 2022, The Author(s).

Keywords

Author Keywords

Reflection Concept Maps Classroom discussion Expert examples Question prompts

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Instructional Technology, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, NWO
Grant: 409–15-209
This work was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [project number 409–15-209], TechYourFuture, and Thales Nederland BV.
References 10 References
1 Azevedo, Roger, Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning, Educational Psychologist, 40, 4, pp. 193-197, (2005)
2 Bannert, Maria, Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 4, pp. 359-375, (2006)
3 International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies, (2013)
4 Belland, Brian R., A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition, Educational Psychologist, 48, 4, pp. 243-270, (2013)
5 Berthold, Kirsten, Do learning protocols support learning strategies and outcomes? The role of cognitive and metacognitive prompts, Learning and Instruction, 17, 5, pp. 564-577, (2007)
6 Chen, Nian Shing, Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners' reflection levels, Computers and Education, 52, 2, pp. 283-291, (2009)
7 Chi, Michelene T.H., Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding, Cognitive Science, 18, 3, pp. 439-477, (1994)
8 Davis, Elizabeth A., Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 1, pp. 91-142, (2003)
9 de Jong, Ton A.J.M., Understanding teacher design practices for digital inquiry–based science learning: the case of Go-Lab, Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 2, pp. 417-444, (2021)
10 Eshuis, Elise H., Expert examples and prompted reflection in learning with self-generated concept maps, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38, 2, pp. 350-365, (2022)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
11
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers