Article Gold Open Access 2025

Does cognitive load moderate students’ learning engagement mechanism in blended learning?

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education
Journal · Vol. 14 · Issue 5 · pp. 3904-3916
Abstract

With the popularity of technology-supported blended learning (BL) in vocational colleges, students’ cognitive load (CL) caused by the increasing complexity of BL environments potentially impact the overall learning satisfaction (LS). In order to explore the effects of CL on students’ BL, this study investigates how different dimensions of learning engagement (LE) (emotional, cognitive, and behavioral) impact on students’ LS and whether CL can moderate these relationships. This quantitative study was conducted among 615 Chinese vocational students. Survey research was carried out by questionnaires that have been well-established that were taken and modified from previous studies. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the relationships among these variables. Findings revealed that emotional, cognitive, and behavioral engagement (BE) can positively predict LS. Additionally, BE mediates the relationship between psychological engagement (emotional and cognitive) and LS when CL is not at a low level. CL moderates the pathways from psychological engagement to BE and in turn changes the LE influence mechanism on LS. This study provides valuable insights for educators to stimulate students’ engagement by satisfying their psychological needs, and optimize teaching design to balance CL in order to maintain active LE and satisfaction levels. © 2025 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

blended learning Vocational students Cognitive load Learning engagement Learning satisfaction Moderating effect

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia, Office of Educational Administration, Hebei Sport University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 China Educational Technology Equipment, (2023)
2 Krismadinata, Krismadinata, Blended learning as instructional model in vocational education: Literature review, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 11B, pp. 5801-5815, (2020)
3 Adarkwah, Michael Agyemang, “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19, Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2, pp. 1665-1685, (2021)
4 Castro-Gil, Robin, Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities, Education and Information Technologies, 24, 4, pp. 2523-2546, (2019)
5 Ghani, Shehzad, Blended learning as a vehicle for increasing student engagement, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2021, 167, pp. 43-51, (2021)
6 Li, Jie, Evaluation Method of Hybrid Teaching Reform System Based on the Analysis of Characteristics of Higher Vocational Schools, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST, 546 LNICST, pp. 190-206, (2024)
7 5th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research Icesre, (2022)
8 Kintu, Mugenyi Justice, Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 1, (2017)
9 Guo, Pengyue, The Community of Inquiry perspective on students' social presence, cognitive presence, and academic performance in online project-based learning, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37, 5, pp. 1479-1493, (2021)
10 Huang, Chiao Ling, Influence of Students’ Learning Style, Sense of Presence, and Cognitive Load on Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Environment, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58, 3, pp. 596-615, (2020)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers