Article Gold Open Access 2023

Plagiarism in Secondary School: Minor Inaction with Major Consequences; Плагиат в средней школе: маленькое бездействие с большими последствиями

Integration of Education
Journal · Vol. 27 · Issue 3 · pp. 447-467
Abstract

Introduction. The ease of searching and copying someone else’s text on almost any topic is one of the most important reasons for the prevalence of plagiarism in academic papers. While plagiarism detectors have become a common tool for universities, such systems are practically not used in secondary schools. It is considered to be a serious problem, that high school graduates are unprepared for the academic papers’ originality requirements. Universities are making efforts to overcome this lack of readiness. The authors study the attitude of teachers and learners of the Russian secondary schools toward the problem of plagiarism. Materials and Methods. An anonymous online survey of teachers (n = 2,286) and learners (m = 4,555) of secondary schools in the Vologda, Kaliningrad and Lipetsk regions of the Russian Federation was conducted. The survey was carried out through the Google Forms service. The quantitative and qualitative analysis of the obtained data was carried out. Results. Learners acquire the habit of plagiarism already in secondary school. Secondary school learners are loyal to copying someone else’s text without reference to the source; although they partially admit that by doing so they do wrong. Teachers are less tolerant to this and ready to respond to plagiarism in learners’ papers by lowering marks/grades or by requiring learners to redo the work. Teachers do not always clearly understand which borrowings can be considered legitimate and correct, and which ones are not, they cannot explain this to their learners, cannot instill in them the necessary academic integrity, and cannot establish clear criteria for works evaluation.The use of plagiarism detection systems in schools is unsystematic and it is often the result of the initiative of individual teachers. There is also no methodology for using plagiarism detection systems in secondary schools. Discussion and Conclusion. The conducted studies for the first time provided actual confirmation of the hypotheses. It means that it is necessary to include plagiarism detection systems in the toolkit used in secondary school. We have obtained evidence, that it is necessary to implement such tools in the secondary education system step by step, as well as to create conditions, so that school teachers can acquire relevant skills. The materials of the article will be useful to scientists who study the problems of secondary and high education, managers of the secondary education system at all levels, teachers, lecturers and learners of pedagogical universities. © 2023 National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Secondary Education survey antiplagiat plagiarism plagiarism detection systems testing methodology

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Federal Research Center Informatics and Management of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russian Federation, Antiplagiat Company, Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
The Educational and Methodological Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
Funding & Acknowledgements
Russian Foundation for Basic Research, РФФИ
Grant: 19-29-14130
Funding text 1: This study was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 19-29-14130). The authors are grateful to I. A. Rychkova for her valuable advice on the questionnaire development and for her help in preparing and organizing the survey. The authors are also grateful to the Vologda Institute for Educational Development, the Kaliningrad Regional Institute for Educational Development and personally to V. P. Veidt, the Institute for Educational Development of Lipetsk region and personally to M. A. Selivanova, N. N. Pachina for active assistance in conducting the survey. The authors are grateful to the reviewers who performed a double-blind review of this article. The authors are grateful to A. G. Zotova for her help with the translation.; Funding text 2: Funding: This study was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Project No. 19-29-14130).
References 10 References
1 Inf Obraz, (2021)
2 LaDuke, Rebekah D., Academic Dishonesty Today, Unethical Practices Tomorrow?, Journal of Professional Nursing, 29, 6, pp. 402-406, (2013)
3 Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, (2022)
4 Open Education, (2021)
5 Universitetskoe Upravlenie Praktika I Analiz, (2012)
6 Matematicheskie Metody Raspoznavaniya Obrazov, (2005)
7 Skaar, Håvard, Writing and pseudo-writing from Internet-based sources: Implications for learning and assessment, Literacy, 49, 2, pp. 69-76, (2015)
8 Sureda, Jaume, Academic plagiarism among secondary and high school students: Differences in gender and procrastination, Comunicar, 22, 44, pp. 103-111, (2015)
9 Baysen, Engin, Misconceptions regarding providing citations: To neglect means to take risk for future scientific research, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 104, pp. 177-186, (2019)
10 Hossain, Zakir, University freshmen recollect their academic integrity literacy experience during their K-12 years: results of an empirical study, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18, 1, (2022)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers