Conference paper 2023

Thinking style and inventive problem-solving skill for technical and engineering students

AIP Conference Proceedings
Conference · Vol. 2582 · Issue 1 · Art. 020031
Abstract

The issue of unemployment has become one of the global problems, especially in developing countries. This is due to employers desperately tend to recruit workers with good generic skills. Graduates are lack of command on creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills in the workplace. Therefore, this research was conducted to investigate the pattern and relationship of thinking styles and levels of inventive problem-solving skills among technical and engineering students. The study was conducted using a quantitative approach with a survey research design in which two sets of test were used. The instruments were distributed to UTHM students with a total of 331 samples across five faculties. Data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially to identify the students' thinking style, the level of problem-solving skills, and the relationship between thinking styles and inventive problem-solving skills. The findings show that the majority of the samples practice critical thinking style across faculties and gender. On the other hand, findings also show that the majority of samples have a moderate level in inventive problem-solving skills across faculties and gender. The research results also indicate that there are no significant differences in thinking styles and levels of inventive problem-solving skills across faculties and gender. Finally, the research shows that there is a weak relationship between thinking styles and inventive problem-solving skills among the samples. Researchers recommend that further research should be carried out on intervention to achieve a balanced thinking style and to acquire better problem-solving skills. © 2023 Author(s).

Keywords

Author Keywords

Problem solving skills generic skills creativity and critical thinking styles inventive problem solving skills

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Institute of Excellent Teachers and Leaders in Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia, Malaysia Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training (MyRIVET), Johor Bahru, Malaysia, Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
Institute of Excellent Teachers and Leaders in Education, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia, School of Education, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
School of Humanistic and Applied Science, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliou, Yunlin, Taiwan
Faculty of Technical and Vocational Education, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia
Faculty of Technical and Vocational, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia, MOHE
Grant: 1000/016/018/25(64, RMK-10
We wish to thank the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for funding this study under the Research Excellent Consortium Grant Scheme (KKP) or KPM-Special Grant RMK-10 (JPT(BPKI)1000/016/018/25(64). The authors also would like to extend their gratitude to the Registrar Office Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia for sponsoring this research. We would like to thank Anies Faziehan Zakaria for her support on this research.
References 10 References
1 undefined, (2014)
2 Osr Journal of Electrical Electronics Engineering, (2013)
3 Innovation Algorithm Triz Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity, (1999)
4 Thinking Styles and their Role in Teaching and Learning, (2014)
5 Journal of the European Triz Association, (2018)
6 Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, (2014)
7 Michigan Technological University Session 2225, (2000)
8 Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, (2009)
9 Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia Ke VII, (2012)
10 Kohan-Mass, Judith, Understanding Gender Differences in Thinking Styles of Gifted Children, Roeper Review, 38, 3, pp. 185-198, (2016)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers