Article Gold Open Access 2025

Using clinical cases with diagnostic errors and malpractice claims: impact on anxiety and diagnostic performance in GP clinical reasoning education

Advances in Health Sciences Education
Journal · Vol. 30 · Issue 5 · pp. 1403-1423
Abstract

Erroneous and malpractice claim cases reflect knowledge gaps and complex contextual factors. Incorporating such cases into clinical reasoning education (CRE) may enhance learning and diagnostic skills. However, they may also elicit anxiety among learners, potentially impacting learning. As a result, the optimal utilization of such cases in CRE remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate the effect of erroneous and malpractice claim case vignettes on anxiety and future diagnostic performance in CRE and explores possible underlying factors that may influence learning, including self-reported confidence in the final diagnosis, learners’ satisfaction, and retrospective impact of the cases. In this three-phase experiment, GP residents and supervisors were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions: neutral (without reference to an error), erroneous (involving a diagnostic error), or malpractice claim (involving a diagnostic error along with a malpractice claim description). During the first session, participants reviewed six cases exclusively in the version of their assigned condition, with anxiety levels measured before and after. In the second session, participants solved six neutral clinical cases featuring the same diagnoses as those in the learning phase but presented in different scenarios, along with four filler cases. Diagnostic performance and self-reported confidence in the diagnosis were assessed. The third session measured learners’ satisfaction and longer-term impact on the participants. Case vignettes featuring diagnostic errors or malpractice claims did not lead to increased anxiety and resulted in similar future diagnostic performance compared to neutral vignettes. Additionally, self-reported confidence, learners’ satisfaction and long-term impact scores did not differ significantly between conditions. This suggests these cases can be integrated into CRE programs, offering a valuable source of diverse, context-rich examples that broaden case libraries without interfering with diagnostic performance or causing anxiety in learners. © The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Clinical reasoning education Diagnostic errors Diagnostic performance Emotions Malpractice claim Primary care

Index Keywords

adult clinical competence female human male medical education psychology Humans Internship and Residency controlled study randomized controlled trial anxiety clinical reasoning diagnostic error malpractice Diagnostic Errors
Author Affiliations
Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, Department of Psychology, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
ZonMw
Grant: 839130012
This study was funded by ZonMW, grant number 839130012, from the HGOG funding program for Research of Medical Education. The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
References 10 References
1 Berner, Eta S., Overconfidence as a Cause of Diagnostic Error in Medicine, American Journal of Medicine, 121, 5 SUPPL., pp. S2-S23, (2008)
2 Brandt, Karen Rosemarie, Forgetting emotional and neutral words: An ERP study, Brain Research, 1501, pp. 21-31, (2013)
3 Charlin, Bernard, Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: Theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research, Academic Medicine, 75, 2, pp. 182-190, (2000)
4 Charlin, Bernard, Scripts and clinical reasoning, Medical Education, 41, 12, pp. 1178-1184, (2007)
5 Costa Filho, Galileu B., Effects of deliberate reflection on diagnostic accuracy, confidence and diagnostic calibration in dermatology, Perspectives on Medical Education, 8, 4, pp. 230-236, (2019)
6 Handleiding Bij De Zelf Analyse Vragenlijst, (1980)
7 Domuracki, Kurt J., The impacts of observing flawed and flawless demonstrations on clinical skill learning, Medical Education, 49, 2, pp. 186-192, (2015)
8 Dunphy, Bruce C., Cognitive elements in clinical decision-making: Toward a cognitive model for medical education and understanding clinical reasoning, Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 2, pp. 229-250, (2010)
9 Diagnosis, (2020)
10 Dyre, Liv, Imperfect practice makes perfect: error management training improves transfer of learning, Medical Education, 51, 2, pp. 196-206, (2017)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers