Article Gold Open Access 2024

The impact of advance organizers in virtual classrooms on the development of integrated science process skills

PeerJ Computer Science
Journal · Vol. 10 · Art. e1989
Abstract

Unlike virtual classrooms that have received extensive research attention in both academic and practical contexts because of their ability to improve students’ outcomes, the use of advance organizers are still in need for more research to prove their efficacy in fulfilling expected learning outcomes in these virtual classrooms. Hence, the present study aims to identify the impact of using such organizers in virtual classrooms on the development of students’ integrated science process skills. The present study was applied to 64 students who were studying for their Master’s degree in the vocational education techniques in the’’Research Project’’ course. Participants were randomly divided into two equal experimental groups with 32 students in each. An assessment card of five main domains was used to evaluate students’ skills in research procedural definition, identification and control of the research variables, questions and/or hypotheses, procedures and experimentation besides research interpretation of the results. Data analysis showed that the use of advance organizers in virtual classes was of great effect on the development of participants’ integrated science process skills because skills of students in the first experimental group were better mastered than the skills of their peers in the second experimental group in accordance with the subskills in the five domains. © 2024 Elfeky et al.

Keywords

Author Keywords

COVID-19 Advanced organizations Integrative science Integrative science processes skills Virtual classrooms

Index Keywords

Students Vocational education COVID-19 Computer aided instruction Experimental groups Virtual Classroom Student outcomes Advance organizers Advanced organization Expected learning outcomes Integrative science Integrative science process skill
Author Affiliations
Department of Educational Technologies, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Makkah Province, Saudi Arabia
Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Najran University, Najran, Najran, Saudi Arabia
Centre for Sharia, Najran University, Najran, Najran, Saudi Arabia
Funding & Acknowledgements
Najran University, NU
The authors were funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University, under the General Research Funding program grant code NU/DRP/SEHRC/12/13. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Grant: /12/13
The authors were funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University, under the General Research Funding program grant code NU/DRP/SEHRC/12/13. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References 10 References
1 Journal of Positive School Psychology, (2022)
2 Hacettepe University Journal of Education, (2007)
3 Journal of Positive School Psychology, (2022)
4 Journal of Positive School Psychology, (2022)
5 Alshammary, Farhan Mohammed, Digital Platforms and the Improvement of Learning Outcomes: Evidence Extracted from Meta-Analysis, Sustainability (Switzerland), 15, 2, (2023)
6 Alzahrani, Fahd Kamis J., Gamification for Learning Sustainability in the Blackboard System: Motivators and Obstacles from Faculty Members’ Perspectives, Sustainability (Switzerland), 15, 5, (2023)
7 Alzahrani, Fahd Kamis J., Gamified Platforms: The Impact of Digital Incentives on Engagement in Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Cultural Management: Science and Education, 6, 2, pp. 75-87, (2022)
8 Babaei, Sarah, Comparing the effects of different advance organizers on EFL learners’ listening comprehension: Key vocabularies, previewing comprehension questions, and multimedia annotations, Cogent Education, 6, 1, (2019)
9 Pedagogical Research, (2020)
10 European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, (2020)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
8
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers