Article Gold Open Access 2024

Identifying challenges and best practices for implementing AI additional qualifications in vocational and continuing education: a mixed methods analysis

International Journal of Lifelong Education
Journal · Vol. 43 · Issue 4 · pp. 385-400
Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly integrates into various industries and educational sectors, there is a growing need for an AI-ready workforce. This study, focusing on a novel AI additional qualification in Germany, investigates the underexplored challenges and best practices regarding the learning software, the learning contents, and the didactic design. Addressing the research question ‘What are the teaching and learning experiences in AI additional qualifications, and to what extent do these experiences align?’, we adopted a mixed methods analysis. This entailed interviews with four educators and self-reported questionnaires with 73 learners, triangulating both groups’ findings for comprehensive insights. Key outcomes from this study demonstrate a significant alignment in teaching and learning experiences, particularly in terms of shared challenges. The findings significantly contribute to AI curriculum development and continuing vocational education and training practice. They underscore the necessity for robust and visually engaging learning software, as well as learning content that primarily covers AI basics with practice-oriented examples. Another best practice emerges for blended learning formats, favouring a greater emphasis on face-to-face instruction complemented by teacher-supported self-directed learning. Future research should focus on balancing theoretical and practical knowledge in AI curricula, preparing teachers for AI content delivery, and optimising teacher-learner interactions. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Artificial intelligence Mixed-methods continuing vocational education

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Education and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Bayern, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Artificial Intelligence in Policies Processes and Practices of Vocational Education and Training, (2020)
2 Adult Education Survey AES 2018 Germany, (2020)
3 Cvet in Europe the Way Ahead, (2015)
4 Next Steps for Apprenticeship, (2021)
5 Chao, Peiju, Knowledge of and Competence in Artificial Intelligence: Perspectives of Vietnamese Digital-Native Students, IEEE Access, 9, pp. 75751-75760, (2021)
6 Chen, Xieling, Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, (2020)
7 CHIU, Thomas K.F., Sustainable curriculum planning for artificial intelligence education: A self-determination theory perspective, Sustainability (Switzerland), 12, 14, (2020)
8 Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, (2003)
9 Dignum, Virginia V., The role and challenges of education for responsible ai, London Review of Education, 19, 1, pp. 1-11, (2021)
10 Interessantheit Und Relevanz Des Fachlehrstoffs Quassuqualitatssicherung in Schule Und Unterricht, (2013)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
8
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers