Article 2024

The Impact of Design Thinking, Maker Education, and Project-Based Learning on Self-Efficacy of Engineering Undergraduates

International Journal of Engineering Education
Journal · Vol. 40 · Issue 4 · pp. 851-862
Abstract

Engineering programs in higher education have traditionally focused on technical skills, but there is a need for engineers to develop additional skills such as experimental, making, and design. Design thinking practices are increasingly seen as crucial components of the engineering curriculum. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether integrating project-based learning with Design Thinking and Maker tools can enhance engineering students’ self-efficacy. Given the underrepresentation of women in engineering and past findings on gender differences in making skills, the study also aims to analyze the impact of these educational practices from a gender perspective. This research was conducted over two years with undergraduate engineering students in a real educational setting. It assessed changes in students’ engineering self-efficacy before and after a project-based learning activity that utilized Design Thinking and Maker Education to address real-world problems. The study involved 67 students (45 men, 21 women, and 1 who preferred not to say) and employed a comparative analysis of data collected pre- and post-intervention. The study found significant differences in self-efficacy between male and female students prior to the intervention. After participating in the project-based learning activity, students reported an increase in self-efficacy, with women showing a notable improvement in making skills. The findings suggest that project-based learning activities that incorporate Design Thinking and Maker Education can positively influence engineering students’ self-efficacy. The impact appears to be particularly beneficial for women students, indicating that such educational approaches may help address gender disparities in engineering disciplines. © 2024 TEMPUS Publications.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Project-Based Learning engineering design thinking Maker education

Index Keywords

Professional aspects Engineering education High educations Technical skills Students Project based learning Self Efficacy Design thinking Engineering curriculum Learning Activity Engineering program Engineering undergraduates Maker education
Author Affiliations
Department of Engineering, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Funding & Acknowledgements
Agencia Estatal de Investigación, AEI
This work was supported in part by PID2020-112584RB-C33 funded by MCIN/ AEI / 10.13039/501100011033, the Ram\u00F3n y Cajal programme (P. Santos).
References 10 References
1 Felder, Richard M., The future of engineering education: Part 2. Teaching methods that work, Chemical Engineering Education, 34, 1, pp. 26-39, (2000)
2 Glaser, Robert J., Education and thinking: The role of knowledge, American Psychologist, 39, 2, pp. 93-104, (1984)
3 Woods, Donald R., Three trends in teaching and learning, Chemical Engineering Education, 32, 4, pp. 296-301, (1998)
4 British Journal of Educational Psychology, (1981)
5 Hernandez-de-Menendez, Marcela, Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13, 3, pp. 909-922, (2019)
6 Jabarullah, Noor Hafidzah, The effectiveness of problem-based learning in technical and vocational education in Malaysia, Education and Training, 61, 5, pp. 552-567, (2019)
7 van den Beemt, Antoine, Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support, Journal of Engineering Education, 109, 3, pp. 508-555, (2020)
8 ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, (2002)
9 Nietner, Larissa F., The social impact of stem, experienced: Studies with an engineering design concept for smart devices, Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 3, (2017)
10 Rulifson, Greg Allen, Motivations to Leave Engineering: Through a Lens of Social Responsibility, Engineering Studies, 9, 3, pp. 222-248, (2017)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
3
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85200862188
  • Language English