Article 2024

Trends Affecting Curriculum Reform in Engineering Education: A Scoping Review

International Journal of Engineering Education
Journal · Vol. 40 · Issue 5 · pp. 1245-1261
Abstract

Different influences have shaped curriculum elements in engineering education over the last decade. Prior work has referred to faculty background, accreditation criteria, and industry demands. A recent influence has been the digitalization of the curriculum during the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing many engineering schools to incorporate curriculum changes. In this context, we addressed the following research question in this study: What factors have influenced curriculum reforms in engineering education in the last decade? Thus, the main research objective is to illustrate the main influences over curriculum elements from an academic perspective, aiming to inform future research and innovations in curriculum development. We used a scoping review to synthesize evidence and assess the literature’s scope concerning engineering education curriculum reforms. We collected the papers from the Scopus database to point out key factors and knowledge gaps in the research on curriculum education reforms. According to a two-stage screening process, we selected 73 studies from 80 papers published between 2011 and 2021. Out of these 73 publications, 11 correspond to scientific articles, two to book chapters, and 60 to proceedings of different conferences. To identify emerging themes, all three authors analyzed the abstracts of the remaining 73 papers. This scoping review highlights the significant impact of economic and technological changes on engineering reform, particularly post-COVID-19. It aggregates studies to provide a global perspective, contrasting with prior research on individual institutions. These aggregated approaches reveal broader trends and emerging challenges that support a shared vision in engineering curriculum development and improvement. © 2024 TEMPUS Publications.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Curriculum reform Engineering education Scoping review

Index Keywords

Teaching Curricula Engineering education scoping review Engineering research Reviews Curriculum development Accreditation Curriculum reform Research objectives Research questions Accreditation criteria Curriculum changes Engineering schools Forcings Future innovations
Author Affiliations
School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, RM, Chile
Technology, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Mitchell, John E., Faculty wide curriculum reform: the integrated engineering programme, European Journal of Engineering Education, 46, 1, pp. 48-66, (2021)
2 Ramirez Mendoza, Ricardo A., Engineering Education 4.0:-proposal for a new Curricula, IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2018-April, pp. 1273-1282, (2018)
3 Johnson, Sandra, Disruptions in the process of engineering education - A curriculum design perspective, Procedia Computer Science, 172, pp. 277-282, (2020)
4 Journal of Education, (2011)
5 Brown, Michael Geoffrey, Engineering practice in the academic plan: External influences, faculty, and their teaching roles, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, (2014)
6 Engineer of 2020 Visions of Engineering in the New Century, (2004)
7 Olson, Steve, Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning: Summary of a Forum, Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning: Summary of a Forum, pp. i-45, (2013)
8 Innovation with Impact Creating A Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education, (2012)
9 Moving Forward to Improve Engineering Education, (2007)
10 Case, Jennifer M., The significance of context for curriculum development in engineering education: a case study across three African countries, European Journal of Engineering Education, 41, 3, pp. 279-292, (2016)
Quick Actions
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers
  • EID 2-s2.0-85205987647
  • Language English