Article 2024

Entrepreneurship education in Poland: Contemporary problems and future opportunities

International Journal of Management Education
Journal · Vol. 22 · Issue 1 · Art. 100931
Abstract

Polish schools, regardless of their level, are unable to meet the demands of market changes and expectations of the participants of this market within the context of entrepreneurial knowledge transfer, confirming the lack of agility in current educational approaches. In order to analyse the determinants of the inefficiency of entrepreneurship education in Poland and to establish future recommendations for improving educational outcomes, this study interviewed 494 secondary school pupils and business students both from state and private educational institutions. The Authors have empirically verified the postulate that contemporary educational programs are negatively correlated with the expectations of program recipients and do not equip them with the necessary skills to thrive in the entrepreneurial market. This inadequacy can be attributed to the lack of experience on the part of educators in efficiently imparting entrepreneurial knowledge. Our research indicates that the implementation of a practice-oriented approach in the reconstruction of entrepreneurship education curricula should constitute a significant factor in Polish academic policy, and it will provide foundations for future scientific studies in the field. This paper is the first one in the European Union to take into account the perspectives of students whose expectations of entrepreneurship school programs have hitherto been ignored. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

Author Keywords

entrepreneurship education Effectiveness opportunities Threats

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Economics, European University of Medical and Social Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Politechnika Koszalinska, Koszalin, Poland
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Abrami, Philip C., Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis, Review of Educational Research, 85, 2, pp. 275-314, (2015)
2 Agresti, Alan, Approximate is better than “Exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions, American Statistician, 52, 2, pp. 119-126, (1998)
3 Anderson, James C., Predicting the Performance of Measures in a Confirmatory Factor Analysis With a Pretest Assessment of Their Substantive Validities, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 5, pp. 732-740, (1991)
4 Aparicio, Gloria, Conceptual structure and perspectives on entrepreneurship education research: A bibliometric review, European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25, 3, pp. 105-113, (2019)
5 Rethinking Marketing Developing A New Understanding of Markets, (2004)
6 Athanassiou, Nicholas A., Critical thinking in the management classroom: Bloom's taxonomy as a learning tool, Journal of Management Education, 27, 5, pp. 533-555, (2003)
7 Baker, Ted, Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 3, pp. 329-366, (2005)
8 Bandera, Cesar, The Dark Side of Entrepreneurship Education: A Delphi Study on Dangers and Unintended Consequences, Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 4, 4, pp. 609-636, (2021)
9 Barba-Sánchez, Virginia, Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education, European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24, 1, pp. 53-61, (2018)
10 Aims International Journal of Management, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
7
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers