Article Gold Open Access 2024

THE EXPECTATIONS OF LECTURERS AND EMPLOYERS TOWARDS WORK-INTEGRATED LEARNING IN THE FIELDS OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM EDUCATION

Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies
Journal · Vol. 24 · Issue 2 · pp. 293-302
Abstract

Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) is an instructional method that integrates the requirements of the employment sector into curriculum design, blending academic and practical training. The key drivers of this type of learning management are lecturers and employers. This study aims to compare expectations in WIL, classified by occupation and work experience. Data were collected from two groups of stakeholders, including lecturers from six higher education institutes using WIL learning management, and supervisors responsible for overseeing learners during their practical training period in the hospitality and tourism field. Fieldwork was conducted with employers in managerial positions at nine hotels in Thailand, using cluster random sampling to obtain the 19 participants. The research instrument was an assessment form evaluating the performance expected of learners upon graduation. The statistics used to analyze the data included mean (x̅), standard deviation (SD), and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The findings indicate that lecturers and employers have the highest expectations for WIL learning in the hospitality and tourism field (x̅ = 4.63, SD = 0.27), with different occupations and experiences having similar expectations for WIL learning. These results offer new insights into identifying stakeholder groups as informants for data collection and need analysis in designing or improving curricula. Additionally, the findings can guide curriculum developers in selecting main stakeholders for data collection and need analysis used in curriculum design. © 2024 Silpakorn University. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Work Integrated Learning (WIL) Thailand hospitality and tourism Expectations of lecturers and employers

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
School of Industrial Education and Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Abma, Tineke A., Stake’s responsive evaluation: Core ideas and evolution, New Directions for Evaluation, 2001, 92, pp. 7-22, (2001)
2 Work Based Learning and Work Integrated Learning Fostering Engagement with Employers, (2016)
3 Baum, Tom G., Skills and training for the hospitality sector: A review of issues, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54, 3, pp. 343-364, (2002)
4 Billett, Stephen Richard, Emerging Perspectives on Workplace Learning, Emerging Perspectives of Workplace Learning, pp. 1-15, (2008)
5 Cooper, Lesley L., Work Integrated Learning: A guide to effective practice, Work Integrated Learning: A Guide to Effective Practice, pp. 1-221, (2010)
6 Crespo-García, Raquel M., Aligning assessment with learning outcomes in outcome-based education, 2010 IEEE Education Engineering Conference, EDUCON 2010, pp. 1239-1246, (2010)
7 International Journal for E Learning Security, (2011)
8 Ferns, Sonia J., Assessing student outcomes in fieldwork placements: An overview of current practice, Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 13, 4, pp. 207-224, (2012)
9 Fleming, Jenny, The impact of work-integrated learning students on workplace dynamics, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 25, (2019)
10 Fleming, Jenny, Successful work-integrated learning relationships: A framework for sustainability, International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19, 4, pp. 321-335, (2018)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers