Article Gold Open Access 2025

Transdisciplinary learning environments that stimulate co-creation and co-learning between students and external partners: an empirical exploration

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Journal · Vol. 12 · Issue 1 · Art. 1768
Abstract

To effectively prepare students for navigating complex societal and sustainability challenges, higher education institutions are increasingly experimenting with transdisciplinary learning environments (TLEs) in which students collaborate with external stakeholders across disciplinary and sectoral boundaries. This empirical study explores how TLEs in Dutch higher education are designed to support co-creation and co-learning between students and societal actors. Using a multiple case study design, eleven TLEs across research universities and universities of applied sciences were analysed. The findings reveal three types of TLEs: Consultancy TLEs (C-TLEs), where students address real-world problems posed by commissioners; Participatory TLEs (P-TLEs), where all participants are explicitly positioned as learners in co-creation processes; and Student-Led TLEs (SL-TLEs), where students initiate the challenge based on their intrinsic motivation and seek out relevant stakeholders. The pedagogical and design decisions made within each type were identified, focusing on how co-creation is facilitated across the phases of co-design, co-production, and co-dissemination, and to what extent co-learning is an explicit goal. While co-creation was often supported, co-learning—especially for stakeholders—was rarely intentionally designed for or assessed. P-TLEs were most explicit in embedding co-creation and co-learning in goals, activities, and support structures. Across cases, several enablers and barriers were identified, such as teacher roles, assessment alignment, use of physical spaces, and institutional embedding. Our findings highlight the importance of designing for “freedom within structure,” recognising learning surprises, and enabling reciprocal partnerships to strengthen TLE impact. The conclusion stresses that while TLEs hold great promise for transformative education and societal engagement, the concept and practice of co-learning remain underdeveloped. These findings call for more research and practical experimentation into supporting, assessing, and making visible the co-learning processes of all actors involved—students, teachers, and stakeholders alike—as a critical step toward realising the third mission of higher education. © The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Not provided

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Universiteit Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands
Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Deventer, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
Nationaal Regieorgaan Onderwijsonderzoek, NRO
The authors wish to thank all the teachers and educational designers who took part in all the interviews and openly shared their documents, experiences, challenges and lessons learned. We also like to thank Debby Gerritsen for taking part in the data collection. Funding agency: Nationaal Regieorgaan Onderwijsonderzoek [Dutch National Educational Research Council], Grant number : 40.5.22945.401/16424.
Grant: 40.5.22945.401/16424
The authors wish to thank all the teachers and educational designers who took part in all the interviews and openly shared their documents, experiences, challenges and lessons learned. We also like to thank Debby Gerritsen for taking part in the data collection. Funding agency: Nationaal Regieorgaan Onderwijsonderzoek [Dutch National Educational Research Council], Grant number : 40.5.22945.401/16424.
References 10 References
1 Akkerman, Sanne Floor, Learning at boundaries, International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 1, pp. 21-25, (2011)
2 Andrews, Lisa M., Conceptualising boundary work activities to enhance credible, salient and legitimate knowledge in sustainability transdisciplinary research projects, Environmental Science and Policy, 155, (2024)
3 Baggen, Yvette, Making Entrepreneurship Education Available to All: Design Principles for Educational Programs Stimulating an Entrepreneurial Mindset, Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 5, 3, pp. 347-374, (2022)
4 Baggen, Yvette, Examining the potential of in- and extra-curricular challenge-based learning in higher education: A delphi study, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62, 4, pp. 1348-1362, (2025)
5 Bakırlıoğlu, Yekta, Co-learning for sustainable design: The case of a circular design collaborative project in Ireland, Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, (2021)
6 van den Beemt, Antoine, Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support, Journal of Engineering Education, 109, 3, pp. 508-555, (2020)
7 van den Beemt, Antoine, Conceptualising variety in challenge-based learning in higher education: the CBL-compass, European Journal of Engineering Education, 48, 1, pp. 24-41, (2023)
8 Development and Current Issues Journal of Research Practice, (2015)
9 Bhatta, Astha, Harvesting living labs outcomes through learning pathways, Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 9, (2025)
10 Biggs, John B., Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment, Higher Education, 32, 3, pp. 347-364, (1996)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers