Article Gold Open Access 2025

EU protection requirements for ePortfolios in clinical healthcare education

BMC Medical Education
Journal · Vol. 25 · Issue 1 · Art. 1640
Abstract

Background: When using ePortfolios in healthcare education, the collection and processing of personal data from various stakeholders, also known as data subjects (e.g., students, mentors, supervisors) is inevitable. This is why it is crucial to identify the stakeholders who need to comply with legal obligations imposed by data protection law, and to assess the legal grounds for processing personal (health) data. Research on the legal aspects of such ePortfolios is lacking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify and document the data protection requirements for ePortfolios in clinical healthcare education that apply in the EU. Methods: Desk research based on a traditional legal analysis of legislation, policy documents, guidelines, case law, and legal doctrine was performed during a multidisciplinary ePortfolio research project. Results: The analysis resulted in a description of the relevant EU data protection requirements covering the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the General Data Protection Regulation, a translation of these legal requirements into the context of ePortfolios in clinical healthcare education and the formulation of recommendations for data protection compliance based on these insights: (1) the duties and responsibilities of educational institutions and the healthcare student must be clarified in an agreement before the start of an internship, (2) ‘(substantial) public interest’ is the most appropriate legal basis for the processing of health data in ePortfolios, and (3) adequate and appropriate measures to protect the fundamental rights and interests of the data subjects must be provided. Conclusion: This study contributes to the limited literature on the legal aspects of the use of digital technologies, such as ePortfolios, in healthcare education. There is a need for rigorous evidence on how to design legally compliant ePortfolios for healthcare education. © The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

Author Keywords

workplace learning Consent Data protection Digital portfolios EPortfolios GDPR Health data

Index Keywords

human medical education Humans European union computer security confidentiality Education, Medical
Author Affiliations
Department of Educational Studies, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, VOV, Belgium, Artevelde University of Applied Sciences, Ghent, Belgium
Law and Technology, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, VOV, Belgium
Funding & Acknowledgements
Vlaamse regering
Grant: S003219N
Funding text 1: This study was conducted within the SCAFFOLD project (SN003219N) which was financed by FWO (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek). Special thanks to the SCAFFOLD research team for the collaboration and advice.; Funding text 2: Ethical approval for the different sub-projects of the research project funded by the Flemish government (S003219N, www.sbo-scaffold.com/EN ) was obtained from the Ethical committees from the different universities (UGent and KULeuven). Given the aim of the legal sub-project it was not necessary to seek advice from the Ethics Committee, as it was limited to desk research.
References 10 References
1 Janssens, Oona, The role of ePortfolios in supporting learning in eight healthcare disciplines: A scoping review, Nurse Education in Practice, 63, (2022)
2 Med Teach, (2022)
3 Tim Dornan, Tim L., Workplace learning, Perspectives on Medical Education, 1, 1, pp. 15-23, (2012)
4 undefined
5 Verhees, Myrthe J.M., Exploring workplace-based learning in distributed healthcare settings: a qualitative study, BMC Medical Education, 24, 1, (2024)
6 Gray, Michelle, Australian midwifery student's perceptions of the benefits and challenges associated with completing a portfolio of evidence for initial registration: Paper based and ePortfolios, Nurse Education in Practice, 39, pp. 37-44, (2019)
7 Oj L 119
8 2012 C 326, (2012)
9 Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion 1 2010 on the Concepts of Controller and Processor Wp 169, (2010)
10 undefined, (2021)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers